Addiction Research Ethics and the Belmont Principles: Do Drug Users Have a Different Moral Voice?
Addiction Research Ethics and the Belmont Principles: Do Drug Users Have a Different Moral Voice?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/10826084.2010.528125
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Fisher, Celia B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fisher, Celia B.
本研究采用半结构式访谈和内容分析的方法，考察街头吸毒者适用于三种假想成瘾研究伦理困境的道德原则。参与者(n=90)是2009年在纽约市招募的不同种族、经济条件较差的吸毒者。参与者应用了一系列对背景敏感的道德戒律，包括尊重、仁慈、正义、关系、职业义务、规则和务实的自我利益。对未来的研究和负责任的成瘾研究的局限性和启示进行了讨论。
This study used semi-structured interviews and content analysis to examine moral principles that street drug users apply to three hypothetical addiction research ethical dilemmas. Participants (n = 90) were ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged drug users recruited in New York City in 2009. Participants applied a wide range of contextually sensitive moral precepts, including respect, beneficence, justice, relationality, professional obligations, rules, and pragmatic self-interest. Limitations and implications for future research and the responsible conduct of addiction research are discussed.