Rethinking Representation
Rethinking Representation
复制标题
重新思考代表性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
Jane J. Mansbridge
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jane J. Mansbridge;Jane J. Mansbridge
除了传统的“承诺”代表形式之外，实证政治学家最近还分析了几种新的代表形式，这里称之为“预期”、“陀螺”和“替代”代表形式。这些最近被认可的形式都不符合为承诺代表而制定的民主问责标准，但每种形式都产生了一套可以对其进行判断的规范标准。与适用于承诺代表的二元标准相比，这些标准是系统性的。他们是深思熟虑的而不是集体的。它们是复数而不是单数。
Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.