Questions that Remain: Pieter Spierenburg’s reply to Randolph Roth
Questions that Remain: Pieter Spierenburg’s reply to Randolph Roth
复制标题
剩下的问题：彼得·斯皮伦堡对伦道夫·罗斯的答复
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Spierenburg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Spierenburg
2011年6月15日，我读到兰多夫罗斯对我的批评评论的回复的那天，《卫报》发表了一篇关于莱顿博物馆一个展览的文章，这篇文章被这样一个事实所吸引：在荷兰，19位获得诺贝尔奖的荷兰人中，很少有一条街道以他们的名字命名。这当然是罗斯的信用，他引导我的思想进入意想不到的方向，他们会远离没有他的书。《卫报》的标题简单地说：“荷兰...
On 15 June 2011, the day on which I read Randolph Roth’s reply to my critical review, the Volkskrant published an item about an exhibition in a Leiden museum occasioned by the fact that in the Netherlands very few of the nineteen Dutchmen who had received the Nobel prize had a street named after them. It is surely to Roth’s credit that he leads my thoughts into unexpected directions from where they would have stayed away without his book. The heading in the Volkskrant simply states: «the Dutc...