Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments
Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments
复制标题
新颖图案的审美判断：个人判断分析
DOI：
10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.755
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
L. Höfel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Jacobsen;L. Höfel
审美判断进行了调查，使用相结合的nomothetic和具体的方法。参与者判断新的图形模式与他们自己的个人定义的“美”的判断分析得出的判断策略，以及一组模型的个人案例模型。正如预测的那样，对称性与审美判断的相关性最高。刺激复杂性是第二高的积极评价的相关性。因此，在小组一级达成了一致意见。然而，判断分析表明存在很大的个体差异。这些包括使用对称性或复杂性线索，这与主要群体的使用相反，例如，一些参与者认为不对称的图案更漂亮。这些发现表明，只考虑群体模型会使个体差异变得平等，并产生误导。群体模型是有意义的;然而，个体判断分析以一种更准确的方式代表了个体的判断模式。
Aesthetic judgments were investigated using a combined nomothetic and idiographic approach. Participants judged novel graphic patterns with respect to their own personal definitions of “beauty” Judgment analysis was employed to derive individual case models of judgment strategies as well as a group model. As predicted, symmetry had the highest correlations with aesthetic judgments of beauty. Stimulus complexity was the second-highest correlate of a positive evaluation. Thus, there was agreement at the group level. The judgment analyses, however, indicated substantial individual differences. These included use of symmetry or complexity cues that were contrary to the main group use, e.g., a few participants considered nonsymmetric patterns more beautiful. These findings suggest that exclusive consideration of the group model would have leveled the individual differences and been misleading. The group model is significant; however, the individual judgment analyses represent individual patterns of judgment in a notedly more accurate way.