Space in Numerical and Ordinal Information: A Common Construct?
Space in Numerical and Ordinal Information: A Common Construct?
复制标题
数字和序数信息中的空间：常见的构造？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Plewnia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Schroeder;H. Nuerk;C. Plewnia
空间在数字处理中有明显的作用，既在工具性学习中有明确的作用，也在数字的心理操作中有隐含的作用。除了行动决策、行动产生和注意力，数值量级或序数对空间的反应相关效应在反应代码的空间-数值关联效应（SNARC）中得到了很好的记录。在这里，随着震级位置的增加，右比左的反应变得相对更快。然而，在具有有序信息的非数值任务中，也观察到类似snarc的行为特征，并启发了整合有序和数值度量的看似空间效应的新模型。为了进一步研究这一问题，我们报告了数值SNARC和有序SNARC效应之间的比较，以研究群体水平的特征和个人水平的推断，从广义的观点，即收敛效度。被试在包含数量级和顺序信息的1-5数值刺激和仅包含顺序信息的工作日刺激下解决顺序相关（分类前/分类后）和顺序无关（字体颜色分类）任务。在大小和顺序相关的snarc之间观察到一个小的相关性，但是在与顺序无关的颜色判断中效果不明显。在群体水平上，顺序相关的空间-数值关联最好用线性量级预测因子来解释，而工作日的SNARC效应是分类的。受这些任务和分析的代表性的限制，结果与激活基数和序数信息心理加工空间的单一模态认知机制不一致。通过区分不同的空间激活，可能由视觉空间和言语工作记忆介导，并将结果与具象数字认知的发现联系起来，提出了一种维持广义观点的可能解决方案。
Space is markedly involved in numerical processing, both explicitly in instrumental learning and implicitly in mental operations on numbers. Besides action decisions, action generations, and attention, the response-related effect of numerical magnitude or ordinality on space is well documented in the Spatial-Numerical Associations of Response Codes (SNARC) effect. Here, right- over left-hand responses become relatively faster with increasing magnitude positions. However, SNARC-like behavioral signatures in non-numerical tasks with ordinal information were also observed and inspired new models integrating seemingly spatial effects of ordinal and numerical metrics. To examine this issue further, we report a comparison between numerical SNARC and ordinal SNARC-like effects to investigate group-level characteristics and individual-level deductions from generalized views, i.e., convergent validity. Participants solved order-relevant (before/after classification) and order-irrelevant tasks (font color classification) with numerical stimuli 1-5, comprising both magnitude and order information, and with weekday stimuli, comprising only ordinal information. A small correlation between magnitude- and order-related SNARCs was observed, but effects are not pronounced in order-irrelevant color judgments. On the group level, order-relevant spatial-numerical associations were best accounted for by a linear magnitude predictor, whereas the SNARC effect for weekdays was categorical. Limited by the representativeness of these tasks and analyses, results are inconsistent with a single amodal cognitive mechanism that activates space in mental processing of cardinal and ordinal information alike. A possible resolution to maintain a generalized view is proposed by discriminating different spatial activations, possibly mediated by visuospatial and verbal working memory, and by relating results to findings from embodied numerical cognition.
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149
发表时间：
1990-01-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
LORCH, RF;MYERS, JL
通讯作者：
MYERS, JL
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Patro, Katarzyna;Fischer, Ursula;Cress, Ulrike
通讯作者：
Cress, Ulrike