The Consumer Science of Sharing: A Discussant’s Observations

The Consumer Science of Sharing: A Discussant’s Observations
复制标题

分享的消费者科学:一位讨论者的观察

DOI:
10.1086/685861
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
F. Rudmin
F. Rudmin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Rudmin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这位讨论者对收集到的关于分享的消费者行为的文章的反应是基于1983-99年间关于所有权和财产心理的研究记录。这里的主要建议是:(1)共享被定义为不止一个人同时或连续地使用一个物体(例如,汽车)、一个空间(例如,客厅)或无形的(例如,身份);(2)用Ichheiser、Heider和Goffman使用的天真的现象学方法来更好地描述和分析共享;(3)将由共享所有权产生的共享与由所有者的共享特权引起的共享区分开来;(4)所有权被定义为对未来效用的财产的社会和法律保护,以便允许所有者如利特温斯基所说的那样,在法语中有放松的预期,注意缓和;(5)购物和购买是有别于消费者使用库存的库存行为,并且在此之前;(6)通过数字中介共享(例如,Uber)访问的分布式库存被视为替代库存行为;(7)“共享经济”学术更好地探索和利用(A)所有权理论、(B)儿童发展、(C)库存管理和(D)竞争理论子领域的文献。
This discussant’s response to the collected articles on the consumer behavior of sharing draws on a 1983–99 record of research on the psychology of ownership and property. The major recommendations here are: (1) that sharing be defined as the simultaneous or sequential use of an object (e.g., car), a space (e.g., living room), or an intangible (e.g., identity) by more than one individual; (2) that sharing be better described and analyzed by the naive phenomenology methods used by Ichheiser, Heider, and Goffman; (3) that sharing arising from shared ownership be distinguished from sharing arising from an owner’s prerogative to share; (4) that ownership be defined as social and legal protection of possessions for future utility in order to allow owners, as Litwinski theorized, to have relaxed expectations, in French, attente dans la détente; (5) that shopping and purchasing are inventory behaviors that are distinct from, and prior to, consumers’ use of inventory; (6) that distributed inventory accessed by digitally mediated sharing (e.g., Uber) be examined as alternative inventory behavior; (7) that scholarship on the “sharing economy” better explore and exploit the literatures in the subfields of (a) ownership theory, (b) child development, (c) inventory management, and (d) competition theory.