Handling “Hot Potatoes”: Ethical, Legal, Safeguarding, and Political Quandaries of Researching Drug-Using Offenders
Handling “Hot Potatoes”: Ethical, Legal, Safeguarding, and Political Quandaries of Researching Drug-Using Offenders
复制标题
处理“烫手山芋”：研究吸毒罪犯的道德、法律、保障和政治困境
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
P. Davis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Love;A. Vetere;P. Davis
在政治化的刑事司法环境中进行涉及吸毒者的定性实地研究，给研究人员带来了一系列独特的伦理、法律的和保障方面的关切和困境。对构成联合王国政府（英格兰和威尔士）刑事司法战略一部分的社区吸毒罪犯的定性研究很少（Senker和绿色; Hucklesby和Wincup）。Hodgson、帕克和Seddon强调这一群体是一个新兴的研究人群。本文旨在提供一个更近的贡献，涵盖了访问和研究的困难，难以达到和政治化的刑事司法吸毒人群，如再创伤的风险，风险评估，保障，刑事披露，和人身安全。第一作者反映了她的研究，从她自己独特的政治立场，作为一个政策顾问，英国政府的刑事司法毒品政策，以期提供建议，研究与难以达到和隐藏的人口谁代表一个边缘化的群体。在研究中结合反身性和使用解释现象学分析作为一种研究方法证明有助于解决和克服这些伦理，政治和其他困境。
Conducting qualitative field research involving drug users within a politicized criminal justice setting presents a unique set of ethical, legal, and safeguarding concerns and quandaries for researchers. There is a paucity of qualitative research with community-based drug-using offenders who form part of the UK Government (England and Wales) criminal justice strategies (Senker and Green; Hucklesby and Wincup). Hodgson, Parker, and Seddon highlighted this group as an emerging study population. This article aims to provide a more recent contribution covering the difficulties of accessing and researching with a hard to reach and politicized criminal justice drug-using population, such as risks of re-traumatization, risk assessment, safeguarding, criminal disclosure, and personal safety. The first author reflects on her research from her own unique political position as a policy advisor to the UK Government on criminal justice drug policy, with a view to providing recommendations for research with a hard to reach and hidden population who represent a marginalized group. The combination of reflexivity in research and the use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis as a research methodology proved helpful in addressing and overcoming some of these ethical, political, and other quandaries.
针对使用 A 类药物的罪犯的转移和善后计划的有效性和成本效益：系统审查和经济评估。
DOI：
10.3310/hta19060
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hayhurst KP
通讯作者：
Hayhurst KP