Ideological implications of addiction theories and treatment
Ideological implications of addiction theories and treatment
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/016396299266470
复制
发表时间:
1999-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Fox, KJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fox, KJ
Political ideologies lie beneath debates over such apparently objective, scienti c claims as theories of disease causality. Tesh (1988) called these ideologies or values ‘‘hidden arguments’’that direct science and policy toward a particular con guration of facts. Interventions and treatments are, thus, predicated on unconscious assumptions about the nature of individuals and certain populations (Patton 1990). As such, sub rosa ideological assumptions about those addicted to substances infuse common treatment modalities. 1 In other words, drug and alcohol treatment approaches imply particular characteristics of their treatment populations.In this article, I begin by analyzing the values behind medical practice. Examining the role of the professional monopoly enjoyed by the medical profession, I consider the direction that the discourse concerning addiction etiology and treatment has taken. Speci cally, I focus on the consequences of ‘‘disease’’theories of addiction to opiates and alcohol. 2 Two di erent approaches toward the treatment of these ‘‘addictions’’are reviewed: Acoholics Anonymous and methadone maintenance treatment. I argue that the speci c designs for treatment re ect the attendant orientations of the targeted populations of users. Sharing a similar theory of addiction, alcohol treatment and methadone maintenance have had diverse histories that may re ect the class composition of their consumers. An analysis of the mechanics of the treatment models reveals that each