Cross-cultural adaptation and validation reliability, validity of the Japanese version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients with hip osteoarthritis
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation reliability, validity of the Japanese version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients with hip osteoarthritis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.015
复制
发表时间：
2013-04-01
影响因子：
7
通讯作者：
Kawaguchi, Takayasu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Satoh, Masae;Masuhara, Kensaku;Kawaguchi, Takayasu
髋关节骨关节炎是世界范围内导致慢性残疾的主要原因之一，对患者的健康相关生活质量有重要影响。为了评估患者局限性的主要因素，髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS)已被制定为英文版1，以改进安大略省西部大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)2，用于对身体要求更高的患者。由于没有日本版本的HOOS可用，本研究的目标是根据Guillmin和Beaton 4，5的指南，跨文化地调整和验证HOOS在大量患有髋关节OA 3的日本患者中的使用。获得了可接受的内部一致性和良好的重测可靠性。根据假设，所有HOOS领域与牛津髋关节评分(OHS)、身体功能(PF)和躯体疼痛(BP)36项短量表(SF-36)以及诺丁汉调整量表日本版髋关节版(NAS-J-HIP)接受度的子量表具有趋同的效度。HOOS分量表和SF-36角色、情绪和社会功能分量表的效度也存在差异。在全髋关节置换术(THA)后(n=21)，骨性关节炎患者所有分量表的反应性都很高。总体而言，日本HOOS问卷适用于日本有症状的髋关节骨性关节炎患者，是有效和可靠的。
Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of chronic disability worldwide and has a significant impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To assess major factors of patients' limitations, the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) has been developed in English 1 to improve the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) 2 for the use in patients with higher physical demands. As no Japanese version of the HOOS was available, the goal of the study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the HOOS for its use in a large number of Japanese patients with hip OA 3 based on the guidelines of Guillemin and Beaton 4, 5. Acceptable internal consistency and good test–retest reliability was achieved. As hypothesized, convergent validity was found for all HOOS domains with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), with the 36-item Short Form (SF-36) subscales for Physical Functioning (PF) and Bodily Pain (BP), and with the subscale for Acceptance of the Nottingham Adjustment Scale Japanese version hip edition (NAS-J-HIP). Divergent validity was also found for the HOOS subscales and SF-36 Role Emotional and Social Functioning subscales. The responsiveness was high for all subscales in OA patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA)(n= 21). Overall, the Japanese HOOS questionnaire is valid and reliable for use in Japanese patients with symptomatic hip OA.