Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology: Insufficient Reporting of Experimental Variables as a Cause for Non-Reproducibility in Animal Physiology? A Case Study.
Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology: Insufficient Reporting of Experimental Variables as a Cause for Non-Reproducibility in Animal Physiology? A Case Study.
复制标题
生理学可重复性的核心：实验变量报告不充分是动物生理学不可重复性的原因？
DOI：
10.1152/ajpregu.00026.2022
复制
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Burggren
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Göpel;Burggren
科学研究中的不可重复性被解释为不充分的报告方法，诚实的错误，甚至不当行为。我们假设，在动物生理学领域内，对不可重现性最吝啬的解释是对关键方法学细节的报告不足。我们进一步假设，相对最近发布的报告指南的实施对期刊文章质量产生了积极影响，通过方法描述的完整性来衡量。我们分析了2008-2010年（通常在当前指南之前）和2018-2020年发表在五种主要生物动物生理学期刊上的84篇研究文章。评估了报告涉及生物学、实验和数据收集的34个变量的合规性。2008-2010年的报告合规率仅为61.61%，2018-2020年仅略微上升至67.5%。在2008-2020年期间，只有21%的报告变量显示出显著差异。我们的结论是，尽管社会和期刊试图促进更大的报告遵守，这种努力迄今为止在动物生理学领域相对不成功。
Nonreproducibility in scientific investigations has been explained by inadequately reporting methodology, honest error, and even misconduct. We hypothesized that, within the field of animal physiology, the most parsimonious explanation for nonreproducibility is inadequate reporting of key methodological details. We further hypothesized that implementation of relatively recently released reporting guidelines has positively impacted journal article quality, as measured by completeness of the methodology descriptions. We analyzed 84 research articles published in five primarily organismal animal physiology journals in 2008–2010 (generally before current guidelines) and 2018–2020. Compliance for reporting 34 variables referring to biology, experiments, and data collection was assessed. Reporting compliance was just ∼61% in 2008–2010, rising only slightly to 67.5% for 2018–2020. Only 21% of the reported variables showed significant differences across the period from 2008–2020. We conclude that, despite attempts by societies and journals to promote greater reporting compliance, such efforts have so far been relatively unsuccessful in the field of animal physiology.
登录
查看更多内容
生理学再现性核心 (CORP)：推进生理学知识库。
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
P. Wagner
通讯作者：
P. Wagner
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Biswas, Arnal K.;Seoka, Manabu;Kumai, Hidemi
通讯作者：
Kumai, Hidemi
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Shalvi, Shaul;Baas, Matthijs;De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
通讯作者：
De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Schreiber, Michael
通讯作者：
Schreiber, Michael
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Maggio, Lauren;Dong, Ting;Artino, Anthony, Jr.
通讯作者：
Artino, Anthony, Jr.