The structure of the bacterial and archaeal community in a biogas digester as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rDNA sequencing analysis

The structure of the bacterial and archaeal community in a biogas digester as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rDNA sequencing analysis
复制标题

通过变性梯度凝胶电泳和 16S rDNA 测序分析揭示沼气池中细菌和古菌群落的结构

DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04064.x
复制
发表时间:
2009-03-01
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Zhou, Z. H.
Zhou, Z. H.
中科院分区:
生物学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, F. H.;Wang, S. B.;Zhou, Z. H.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

为鉴定中温沼气池处理猪粪过程中的细菌和古菌组成,比较两种16 SrDNA方法对微生物结构研究的一致性,通过对两个16 SrDNA克隆文库进行测序,鉴定出69个细菌操作分类单位(OTU)和25个古菌OTU。多数OTU被鉴定为厚壁菌门(占总克隆的47.2%)、拟杆菌门(35.4%)和螺旋体门(13.2%)。优势产甲烷菌为伯金甲烷球菌(29.0%)、巴氏甲烷八叠球菌(27.4%)和亨氏甲烷菌(10.8%)。只有9%的细菌和20%的古细菌OTU与培养的分离株匹配,相似性指数>= 97%。约78%的优势细菌16 SrDNAV 3区变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)结果表明,在消化池中,绝大多数细菌和古细菌都是未培养的,厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroides)和螺旋体门(Spirochaeus)的细菌似乎负责纤维素分解、蛋白质分解、产酸、还原硫和同型乙酸;结果表明,DGGE图谱反映了农村沼气池中微生物的总体结构,DGGE图谱能够反映沼气池中微生物的优势菌群。
To identify the bacterial and archaeal composition in a mesophilic biogas digester treating pig manure and to compare the consistency of two 16S rDNA-based methods to investigate the microbial structure.Sixty-nine bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) and 25 archaeal OTU were identified by sequencing two 16S rDNA clone libraries. Most bacterial OTU were identified as phyla of Firmicutes (47.2% of total clones), Bacteroides (35.4%) and Spirochaetes (13.2%). Methanoculleus bourgensis (29.0%), Methanosarcina barkeri (27.4%) and Methanospirillum hungatei (10.8%) were the dominant methanogens. Only 9% of bacterial and 20% of archaeal OTU matched cultured isolates at a similarity index of >= 97%. About 78% of the dominant bacterial (with abundance > 3%) and 83% of archaeal OTU were recovered from the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) bands of V3 regions in 16S rDNAs.In the digester, most bacterial and archaeal species were uncultured; bacteria belonging to Firmicutes, Bacteroides and Spirochaetes seem to take charge of cellulolysis, proteolysis, acidogenesis, sulfur-reducing and homoacetogenesis; the most methanogens were typical hydrogenotrophic or hydrogenotrophic/aceticlastic; DGGE profiles reflected the dominant microbiota.This study gave a first insight of the overall microbial structure in a rural biogas digester and also indicated DGGE was useful in displaying its dominant microbiota.