Psychometric properties of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries.

Psychometric properties of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries.
复制标题

七个国家教练-运动员关系问卷 (CART-Q) 的心理测量特性。

DOI:
10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.010
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
S. Jowett
S. Jowett
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. X. Yang;S. Jowett

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在体育运动中,教练员与运动员的关系被视为一种普遍现象。因此,重要的是要评估的普遍性的心理量表,用于衡量教练员与运动员的关系的质量。本研究考察了教练员-运动员关系问卷的文化等效性或测量不变性方法:对来自比利时(N = 200)、英国(N = 382)、中国(N = 200)、希腊(N = 115)、西班牙(N = 120)、瑞典(N = 169)、和美利坚合众国(N = 177)完成了CART-Q。在七个国家中,多组均值和协方差结构(MACS)分析支持CART-Q在三个一阶因子模型中的因子有效性。潜在的平均差异的CART-Q的检查揭示了一些变化的强度,运动员认为在质量的关系,他们的教练在不同的countries.CONCLUSIONSOverall,这些结果提供了额外的证据的心理测量特性的CART-Q,并强调它是一个健全的工具,可以应用于跨文化。
OBJECTIVESIn the sport context, the coach–athlete relationship has been viewed and studied as a universal phenomenon. It is thus important to assess the universality of the psychometric scale that is used to measure the quality of coach–athlete relationships. The present study examined the cultural equivalence or measurement invariance of the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (11-item, athlete version CART-Q).DESIGNCross-sectional study.METHODSA total of 1363 athletes from Belgium (N = 200), Britain (N = 382), China (N = 200), Greece (N = 115), Spain (N = 120), Sweden (N = 169), and United States of America (N = 177) completed the CART-Q.RESULTSMulti-group mean and covariance structure (MACS) analyses supported the factorial validity of the CART-Q in a three-first-order factor model across the seven countries. An examination of the latent mean differences of the CART-Q revealed some variation in terms of the intensity that athletes perceive in the quality of the relationship with their coach across the different countries.CONCLUSIONSOverall, these results supply additional evidence of the psychometric properties of the CART-Q and highlight that it is a sound instrument that can be applied cross-culturally.
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.54.12.1070
发表时间: 1999-12-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Sue, S
通讯作者: Sue, S