Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA.
Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1101/gr.266551.120
复制
发表时间:
2021-07
期刊:
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Davis TB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vaisvila R;Ponnaluri VKC;Sun Z;Langhorst BW;Saleh L;Guan S;Dai N;Campbell MA;Sexton BS;Marks K;Samaranayake M;Samuelson JC;Church HE;Tamanaha E;Corrêa IR Jr;Pradhan S;Dimalanta ET;Evans TC Jr;Williams L;Davis TB
Bisulfite sequencing detects 5mC and 5hmC at single-base resolution. However, bisulfite treatment damages DNA, which results in fragmentation, DNA loss, and biased sequencing data. To overcome these problems, enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq) was developed. This method detects 5mC and 5hmC using two sets of enzymatic reactions. In the first reaction, TET2 and T4-BGT convert 5mC and 5hmC into products that cannot be deaminated by APOBEC3A. In the second reaction, APOBEC3A deaminates unmodified cytosines by converting them to uracils. Therefore, these three enzymes enable the identification of 5mC and 5hmC. EM-seq libraries were compared with bisulfite-converted DNA, and each library type was ligated to Illumina adaptors before conversion. Libraries were made using NA12878 genomic DNA, cell-free DNA, and FFPE DNA over a range of DNA inputs. The 5mC and 5hmC detected in EM-seq libraries were similar to those of bisulfite libraries. However, libraries made using EM-seq outperformed bisulfite-converted libraries in all specific measures examined (coverage, duplication, sensitivity, etc.). EM-seq libraries displayed even GC distribution, better correlations across DNA inputs, increased numbers of CpGs within genomic features, and accuracy of cytosine methylation calls. EM-seq was effective using as little as 100 pg of DNA, and these libraries maintained the described advantages over bisulfite sequencing. EM-seq library construction, using challenging samples and lower DNA inputs, opens new avenues for research and clinical applications.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
de Koning AP;Gu W;Castoe TA;Batzer MA;Pollock DD
通讯作者:
Pollock DD
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Genereux DP;Johnson WC;Burden AF;Stöger R;Laird CD
通讯作者:
Laird CD
DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4939-7481-8_9
发表时间:
2018-01-01
期刊:
DNA METHYLATION PROTOCOLS, 3 EDITION
影响因子:
--
作者:
Peat, Julian R.;Smallwood, Sebastien A.
通讯作者:
Smallwood, Sebastien A.
影响因子:
12.3
作者:
Akalin A;Kormaksson M;Li S;Garrett-Bakelman FE;Figueroa ME;Melnick A;Mason CE
通讯作者:
Mason CE
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Okae H;Chiba H;Hiura H;Hamada H;Sato A;Utsunomiya T;Kikuchi H;Yoshida H;Tanaka A;Suyama M;Arima T
通讯作者:
Arima T