They’re All the Same!. . . but for Several Different Reasons
They’re All the Same!. . . but for Several Different Reasons
复制标题
它们都是一样的！但有几个不同的原因。
DOI：
10.1177/0963721412457363
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Constantina Badea
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mark Rubin;Constantina Badea
研究人员研究人们对社会群体成员之间的差异性的感知，或感知群体差异性，倾向于关注感知者的群体隶属关系导致内群体和外群体同质性效应的方式，包括其他种族效应。然而，最近的进展突出了额外影响的作用。在这篇综述中，我们考虑了（a）知觉者的群体隶属关系，（B）群体的客观可变性，（c）群体的社会地位，（d）群体的集中趋势对特质维度的影响。我们专注于最近的研究在这些领域，突出了战略，上下文相关的，和象征性的感知群体的可变性。我们的结论是，未来的研究需要采取多原因的方法，以提供一个更完整和全面的考虑感知群体的变异性。
Researchers studying people’s perceptions of variability among members of social groups, or perceived group variability, have tended to focus on the ways in which perceivers’ group affiliations lead to in-group and out-group homogeneity effects, including the other-race effect. However, recent advances have highlighted the role of additional influences. In this review, we consider the influence of (a) the perceiver’s group affiliation, (b) the group’s objective variability, (c) the group’s social position, and (d) the group’s central tendency on trait dimensions. We focus on recent research in these areas that has highlighted the strategic, context-dependent, and symbolic nature of perceived group variability. We conclude that future research needs to adopt a multicausal approach in order to provide a more complete and comprehensive account of perceived group variability.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
A. Guinote;C. Judd;M. Brauer
通讯作者：
A. Guinote;C. Judd;M. Brauer