Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial.
Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial.
复制标题
慢性阶段的慢性髓样白血病的前线尼洛替尼与伊马替尼的长期益处和风险:随机ENESTND试验的5年更新。
DOI:
10.1038/leu.2016.5
复制
发表时间:
2016-05
期刊:
影响因子:
11.4
通讯作者:
Kantarjian HM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hochhaus A;Saglio G;Hughes TP;Larson RA;Kim DW;Issaragrisil S;le Coutre PD;Etienne G;Dorlhiac-Llacer PE;Clark RE;Flinn IW;Nakamae H;Donohue B;Deng W;Dalal D;Menssen HD;Kantarjian HM
In the phase 3 Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials–Newly Diagnosed Patients (ENESTnd) study, nilotinib resulted in earlier and higher response rates and a lower risk of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Here, patients' long-term outcomes in ENESTnd are evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. By 5 years, more than half of all patients in each nilotinib arm (300 mg twice daily, 54% 400 mg twice daily, 52%) achieved a molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5; BCR-ABL⩽0.0032% on the International Scale) compared with 31% of patients in the imatinib arm. A benefit of nilotinib was observed across all Sokal risk groups. Overall, safety results remained consistent with those from previous reports. Numerically more cardiovascular events (CVEs) occurred in patients receiving nilotinib vs imatinib, and elevations in blood cholesterol and glucose levels were also more frequent with nilotinib. In contrast to the high mortality rate associated with CML progression, few deaths in any arm were associated with CVEs, infections or pulmonary diseases. These long-term results support the positive benefit-risk profile of frontline nilotinib 300 mg twice daily in patients with CML-CP.