Perceived clinical utility of the suicide crisis syndrome: A multisite pilot study.
Perceived clinical utility of the suicide crisis syndrome: A multisite pilot study.
复制标题
自杀危机综合症的临床效用：多中心试点研究。
DOI：
10.1037/ser0000779
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Galynker,Igor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mitelman,AlexisM;Bafna,Anokhi;Rogers,MeganL;White,Betsy;Karsen,Ethan;Vaaler,Arne;Wolfe,AmberR;Goncearenco,Inna;Galynker,Igor
感知有用性在临床设置是重要的，在实施新的结构和评估。自杀危机综合征（SCS）已被提出并被验证为评估急性自杀风险的理论框架，但临床医生对SCS的看法尚未得到检验。在这项研究中，我们评估了几个医疗机构对SCS的感知效用，以评估其作为临床工具的感知价值。来自三个地点的47名接受过SCS教育但未实施的从业人员样本，以及来自一个系统实施SCS的地点的52名从业人员样本，完成了一项评估其可行性、适宜性、可接受性、增量帮助和总体临床效用的调查。在这两个样本中，临床医生报告了可行性，适当性，可接受性，增量帮助和总体临床效用的有利评级。在样本1中，与没有使用过SCS的临床医生相比，先前使用过SCS的临床医生报告的所有类别的评分明显更高，除了增量帮助。在样本2中，先前使用或未使用SCS的参与者之间的评分没有显着差异。两个样本的比较发现，除了可接受性外，所有类别都没有显著差异，因为样本2的评分明显更高。无论实施情况如何，临床医生报告了对SCS的普遍好感，实施样本的临床医生报告了其使用的可接受性显着提高。这表明临床医生可能支持在临床环境中使用和实施SCS。（PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA，版权所有）
Perceived usefulness in the clinical setting is important in the implementation of novel constructs and assessments. The suicide crisis syndrome (SCS) has been proposed and validated as a theoretical framework for assessing acute suicide risk, but clinicians’ perceptions of the SCS have not yet been examined. In this study, we evaluated perceived utility of the SCS across several provider locations to assess its perceived value as a clinical tool. A sample of 47 practitioners across three sites who had received education about, but no implementation of, the SCS, and a separate sample of 52 practitioners at a site that had systematically implemented the SCS, completed a survey assessing its feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, incremental helpfulness, and overall clinical utility. In both samples, clinicians reported favorable ratings for feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, incremental helpfulness, and overall clinical utility. In Sample 1, clinicians with previous experience using the SCS reported significantly higher ratings for all categories except incremental helpfulness than those without prior SCS use. In Sample 2, there were no significant differences in ratings between participants with or without prior use of SCS. Comparison of the two samples found no significant differences in all categories except acceptability, as those in Sample 2 showed significantly higher ratings. Regardless of implementation, clinicians reported generally favorable perceptions of the SCS, and those from the implementation sample reported significantly higher acceptability of its use. This suggests that clinicians may be supportive of the use and implementation of the SCS in clinical settings.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)