Between Integration Provision and Selection Mechanism: Party Politics, Judicial Constraints, and the Making of French and Dutch Policies of Civic Integration Abroad
Between Integration Provision and Selection Mechanism: Party Politics, Judicial Constraints, and the Making of French and Dutch Policies of Civic Integration Abroad
复制标题
融合规定与选择机制之间：政党政治、司法约束以及法国和荷兰海外公民融合政策的制定
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Bonjour
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Bonjour
荷兰和法国最近都推出了海外公民融合政策，规定家庭移民在获准进入该国之前，必须了解东道国社会的语言和习俗。然而，荷兰的计划比法国严格得多。法国只要求学生参加由法国政府组织和资助的评估和课程，而荷兰政府将入学条件定为通过考试，并且不提供课程。在本文中，我对荷兰和法国公民海外融合项目模式之间的显著差异提出了两种解释。一是政党政治，即政党所采取的立场和政党之间的关系；其次是影响法国和荷兰家庭移民政策的不同司法限制。
Both the Netherlands and France have recently introduced civic integration abroad policies, which stipulate that family migrants are to learn about the language and customs of the host society, before being admitted to the country. The Dutch program however is much more stringent than the French. While France requires only participation in an evaluation and course that are organised and financed by the French state, the Dutch government has made entry conditional upon passing a test and does not offer courses. In this article, I propose two explanations for the significant differences between the modalities of the Dutch and French civic integration abroad programs. The first is related to party politics, that is to the positions adopted by political parties and the relations between them; the second to the different judicial constraints that weigh upon family migration policies in France and in the Netherlands.