Effect of computer-assisted self interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment
Effect of computer-assisted self interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00002030-200101050-00016
复制
发表时间：
2001-01-05
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Field, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Johnson, AM;Copas, AJ;Field, J
目标：制定方法，最大限度地提高一般人口调查中报告艾滋病毒风险行为的准确性。我们评估的可行性，使用计算机辅助的自我完成面试（CASI）相比，笔和纸的自我完成interview（PAPI）。设计：一个概率抽样调查的居民年龄在16-44岁的英国，与交替分配的地址采访CASI（462）或PAPI（439）。方法：个人访谈探索人口和性行为变量。主要成果措施的影响，CASI在有关PAPI的数据质量和报告的一系列behaviors.Results率：共完成了901次访谈，829个人有资格并接受了自我完成模块。数据项的内部一致性与CASI比PAPI更大，项目无应答率更低。总体而言，CASI和PAPI之间的报告率无显著差异。在广义估计方程（GEE）分析中，CASI与PAPI相比的主要效应为OR（95% CI）1.04（0.92-1.17）。变量也被单独检查，包括同性恋伴侣关系（调整后OR 1.26 95% CI 0.69-2.29），支付性服务费用（调整OR 0.68 95% CI 0.29-1.59），手淫（调整后OR 0.89 95% CI 0.66-1.22）和过去5年内有5名或5名以上伴侣结论：我们没有发现CASI对该样本中性HIV危险行为报告率有一致影响的证据。CASI提高了内部一致性，减少了遗漏问题。(C)2001年利平科特威廉姆斯&威尔金斯。
Objectives: To develop methods to maximize the accuracy of reporting HIV risk behaviours in a general population survey. We assessed the feasibility of using a computer-assisted self-completion interview (CASI) in comparison with pen-and-paper self-completion interview (PAPI).Design: A probability sample survey of residents aged 16-44 years in Britain, with alternate assignment of addresses to interview by CASI (462) or PAPI (439).Methods: Personal interviews exploring demographic and sexual behaviour variables. Principal outcome measures were the impact of CASI in relation to PAPI on data quality and rates of reporting a range of behaviours.Results: A total of 901 interviews were completed; 829 individuals were eligible for and accepted the self-completion module. Internal consistency of data items was greater with CASI than PAPI and item non-response was lower. Overall, there was no significant difference in rates of reporting between CASI and PAPI. The main effect for CASI compared with PAPI in a generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was an OR (95% CI) of 1.04 (0.92-1.17). Variables were also examined individually, including homosexual partnership (adjusted OR 1.26 95% CI 0.69-2.29), payment for sex (adjusted OR 0.68 95% CI 0.29-1.59), masturbation (adjusted OR 0.89 95% CI 0.66-1.22) and five or more partners in the past 5 years (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.61-1.19).Conclusion: We found no evidence of a consistent effect of CASI on rates of reporting sexual HIV risk behaviours in this sample. CASI resulted in improvement in internal consistency and a reduction in missed questions. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.