Why Most Published Results on Unit Root and Cointegration are False

Why Most Published Results on Unit Root and Cointegration are False
复制标题

为什么大多数已发表的单位根和协整结果都是错误的

DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.2628645
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies (Topic)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gerry J. Mahar
Gerry J. Mahar
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Luitel;Gerry J. Mahar

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

用协整分析方法对非平稳经济时间序列变量进行建模,已成为实证经济学研究的主流范式。批评者认为,协整分析产生的结果往好里说是无用的,往坏里说是危险的。在这项研究中,我们解释了在经济研究中使用协整分析为什么以及如何可能导致对公共政策的发现和后续建议,这些发现和建议将是不健全的、误导性的和潜在有害的。我们建议,除了对历史上重大政策失败的教学回顾外,这种方法不要用于任何影响公共政策的分析。
The method of cointegration analysis for modeling nonstationary economic time series variables has become a dominant paradigm in empirical economic research. Critics argue that a cointegration analysis produces results that are, at best, useless and, at worst, dangerous. In this research, we explain why and how the use of a cointegration analysis in economic research will likely lead to findings and subsequent recommendations for public policy that will be unsound, misleading and potentially harmful. We recommend that, except for pedagogical review of policy failure of a historical magnitude, this method not be used in any analysis that affects public policy.
时间序列分析:单位根、协整
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊: Econometris Handbook, Chapter 18
影响因子: --
作者:
Tsukuda;Y.
通讯作者: Y.