Pros and cons of using alpha-2 agonists in small animal anesthesia practice.
Pros and cons of using alpha-2 agonists in small animal anesthesia practice.
复制标题
在小动物麻醉实践中使用 α-2 激动剂的利弊。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Greene
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Greene
在引入甲苯噻嗪（ROMPUN，Bayer Corp.，肖尼使命，堪萨斯州）在1962年。在麻醉实践中使用α-2激动剂的决定应基于以下因素，包括患者处置、主诉、手术类型和兽医对药物的熟悉程度。围绕抗胆碱能药物与α-2激动剂同时使用的问题存在争议。患者选择和手术类型有助于确定何时使用抗胆碱能药物与α-2激动剂是有利的。α-2激动剂的拮抗作用可以容易地实现。通常，α-2激动剂与其他药物联合使用，以在全身麻醉前提供神经阻滞剂镇痛或镇静。
The alpha-2 agonists have been used in veterinary practice for over 30 years following the introduction of xylazine (ROMPUN, Bayer Corp., Shawnee Mission, KS) in 1962. The decision to use alpha-2 agonists in anesthesia practice should be based on factors including patient disposition, presenting complaint, type of procedure, and the veterinarian's familiarity with the drug. Controversy surrounds the issue of using anticholinergic agents concurrent with the alpha-2 agonists. Patient selection and procedure type can aid in determining when use of an anticholinergic with the alpha-2 agonist is advantageous. Antagonism of alpha-2 agonists can be readily accomplished. Commonly, alpha-2 agonists are used in combination with other agents to provide neuroleptanalgesia or sedation prior to general anesthesia.