Enhancing self-report of adolescent smoking: The effects of bogus pipeline and anonymity
Enhancing self-report of adolescent smoking: The effects of bogus pipeline and anonymity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.004
复制
发表时间：
2008-10-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Walsh, Raoul A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adams, Jane;Parkinson, Lynne;Walsh, Raoul A.
青少年吸烟率通常通过自我填写的问卷进行评估。然而，人们对这种自我报告的有效性表示担忧。提高有效性的一种方法涉及生物验证的威胁，称为虚假管道方法（BPL）。本研究旨在评估 BPL（使用呼出空气一氧化碳监测仪）和匿名问卷对学生吸烟自我报告数据的影响。高中生（n=801）被随机分配到四种情况之一：匿名问卷+BPL、命名问卷+BPL 匿名问卷（无BPL）和命名问卷（无BPL） 总体而言，37% 的学生认为问卷是获得诚实答案的好方法。在逻辑回归分析中，与非 BPL 学生相比，BPL 学生报告每周吸烟 (OR=1.83 95% CI 1.27-2.65) 和每月吸烟 (OR=1.66 95% CI 1.21-2.28) 的几率显着更高，但终生吸烟的几率则不高。与匿名学生相比，指定问卷条件下的学生报告终生吸烟的几率显着更高（OR=1.49 95% CI 1.08-2.04）。评估青少年当前吸烟模式的研究应考虑采用 BPL 方法。 (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
Adolescent smoking prevalence is usually assessed via self-complete questionnaires. However, concern has been expressed about the validity of such self-report. One approach to increase validity involves the threat of biological validation, known as the bogus pipeline method (BPL). This study aimed to assess the effects of BPL, using an expired air carbon monoxide monitor, and of questionnaire anonymity on student smoking self-report data. High school students (n=801) were randomly allocated to one of four conditions: anonymous questionnaire+BPL, named questionnaire+BPL anonymous questionnaire without BPL and named questionnaire without BPL Overall, 37% of students agreed that questionnaires were a good way to obtain honest answers. In a logistic regression analysis, students in the BPL condition had significantly higher odds of reporting weekly smoking (OR=1.83 95% Cl 1.27-2.65) and monthly smoking (OR=1.66 95% CI 1.21-2.28) but not of lifetime smoking compared with non-BPL students. Students in the named questionnaire condition had a significantly higher odds of reporting lifetime smoking (OR=1.49 95% CI 1.08-2.04) compared with anonymous students. Studies assessing current smoking patterns in adolescents should consider incorporating a BPL method. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.