Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?
Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?
复制标题
引发规范和公平判断：激励重要吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Štěpán Veselý
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Štěpán Veselý
Krupka和Weber(2013)引入了一种激励相容的协调博弈，作为诱导规范判断的另一种方法。然而，我发现，在克鲁普卡-韦伯游戏的激励和非激励版本中，人们提供的反应实际上是相同的。除了对社交适当性的评分外，我还对最后通牒游戏中所有可能的提议进行了公平评分。社会适当性和公平性的评级在低报价(低于或等于平均分配)时相似，但对于被认为比公平更合适的高报价则不同。
Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of social appropriateness, I also elicit ratings of fairness of all possible offers in an ultimatum game. Ratings of social appropriateness and fairness are similar for low offers (below or equal to the equal split), but not for high offers which are judged to be more appropriate than fair.