Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour
Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02001.x
复制
发表时间：
2009-07-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Stoker, Gerry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
John, Peter;Smith, Graham;Stoker, Gerry
本文回顾了政府用于让公民参与以促进更好的公共政策结果的两种截然不同的方法：使用行为经济学的见解推动公民，如Thaler和Sunstein（2009）所总结的那样，或者给予公民思考和辩论解决方案的空间，如协商民主的支持者所指出的那样。本文总结了每种方法，给出了例子，然后比较和对比它们，说明它们的相对优势和劣势。本文件最后指出，这两种方法有一些共同的特点，决策者可以利用这两种方法。
This paper reviews two contrasting approaches governments use to engage the citizen to promote better public policy outcomes: nudging citizens using the insights of behavioural economics, as summarised by Thaler and Sunstein (2009) or giving citizens the space to think through and debate solutions, as indicated by proponents of deliberative democracy. The paper summarises each approach, giving examples; then it compares and contrast them, illustrating their relative strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes by suggesting that the approaches share some common features and policy-makers could useful draw upon both.