Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0269215515570379
复制
发表时间：
2015-12-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Chuter, Vivienne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Searle, Angela;Spink, Martin;Chuter, Vivienne
目的：为了确定，对于慢性腰痛的成年人，与其他治疗方法相比，哪些运动干预措施在减轻疼痛方面最有效。数据来源：检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、PsycINFO和科克伦图书馆，检索时间截止到2014年10月。在数据库中检索已发表的随机试验报告，这些试验研究了非糖尿病性慢性腰痛的治疗。具体起源与运动干预。两位作者独立审查并选择了相关试验。方法学质量进行了评价，使用唐斯和黑色tool.Results：45项试验符合纳入标准，39个被纳入荟萃分析。联合荟萃分析显示，与对照组或其他治疗组相比，使用运动的干预组的慢性腰痛显著降低（标准平均差（SMD）=-0.32，95% CI-0.44至-0.19，P
Objective: To determine, for adults with chronic low back pain, which exercise interventions are the most effective at reducing pain compared to other treatments.Data sources: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library was conducted up to October 2014.Review methods: Databases were searched for published reports of randomised trials that investigated the treatment of chronic low back pain of non-specific origin with an exercise intervention. Two authors independently reviewed and selected relevant trials. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black tool.Results: Forty-five trials met the inclusion criteria and thirty-nine were included in the meta-analysis. Combined meta-analysis revealed significantly lower chronic low back pain with intervention groups using exercise compared to a control group or other treatment group (Standard Mean Deviation (SMD) =-0.32, CI 95% -0.44 to -0.19, P