Accounting for the public interest: public ineffectuals or public intellectuals?
Accounting for the public interest: public ineffectuals or public intellectuals?
复制标题
考虑公共利益：公共无能者还是公共知识分子？
DOI：
10.1108/09513570510620466
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christine Cooper
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christine Cooper
目的 – 为会计和金融学者提供一个案例，让他们发挥更积极的社会作用。设计/方法论/途径 – 介绍“公共知识分子”出版的一系列关于实践的作品。每个理论家本身都可以被认为是一位杰出的理论家。他们的突出之处在于，他们通过积极参与发展了自己的理论。调查结果——学术界所运作的世界的经济和政治利益是通过创造一批知识分子而得以延续的，这些知识分子不仅面临着质疑现状的重大挑战，而且也许更重要的是，还面临着学术界之外的冒险。然而，可以说，现在是学者们这样做的最重要的时刻。学者们具备必要的理论和研究技能，可以使新兴运动保持连贯性，并使他们能够克服长期阻碍社会抗议的神话所造成的障碍。原创性/价值——本文提供了实用和……
Purpose – To present a case for accounting and finance academics to have a more active social role.Design/methodology/approach – A range of published works by “public intellectuals” on praxis is presented. Each theorist could be considered to be an eminent theoretician in their own right; what marks them out is that they have developed their theories by active engagement.Findings – The economic and political interests of the world in which academics operate are perpetuated by the creation of a breed of intellectuals who encounter significant challenges not only to questioning the status quo but, perhaps more importantly, to venturing outside of the academy. Yet, arguably there has never been a more important time for academics to do just that. Academics are armed with the necessary theoretical and research skills to bring coherence to fledgling movements and to enable them to overcome the barriers created by the myths perpetuated to hamper social protest.Originality/value – This paper offers practical and...