Developing And Using Rubrics To Evaluate Subjective Engineering Laboratory And Design Reports
Developing And Using Rubrics To Evaluate Subjective Engineering Laboratory And Design Reports
复制标题
开发和使用评分标准来评估主观工程实验室和设计报告
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Dieterich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Kellogg;J. Mann;A. Dieterich
在过去的两年里，爱荷华州州立大学的几个航空航天工程和工程力学系的教师一直在利用量规来评估学生在实验室课程和工程设计课程序列中的工作。实验室课程主要由应届毕业生组成，设计课程序列为应届毕业生。开发规则不是一件容易的事情，需要反复和耐心。本文将讨论如何发展和完善的规则。教师和助教的观察和反馈将与学生的总结性调查数据一起沿着。教师和助教一致赞赏的标题，以确保统一的评分，并作为一种手段来描述完成作业的标准。然而，对学生的调查结果显示，在主要学习者群体和使用标题评分的高年级学生群体之间存在差异。高年级学生几乎一致对题目持肯定态度，甚至要求提供题目，而低年级学生对题目不太满意。调查的结果被提出并沿着讨论，同时讨论为解决学生关切的问题而正在实施的改革。
In the past two years several faculty in Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at Iowa State University have been utilizing rubrics to evaluate student work in laboratory courses as well as the engineering design course sequence. The laboratory course had primarily sophomores and the design course sequence were graduating seniors. Developing rubrics is not an easy task and requires iteration and patience. This paper will discuss how the rubrics were developed and refined. Observations and feedback from faculty and teaching assistants who are using the rubrics will be presented along with summative surveys data from the students. The faculty and teaching assistants uniformly appreciated the rubrics to ensure uniform grading and as a means to describe standards for completing assignments. The survey results from the students however show a difference between the group of primarily sophomores and the group of seniors who were graded using rubrics. The seniors were almost uniformly positive about the rubrics and even asked for rubrics while the sophomores were less satisfied with the rubrics. The results of the survey are presented and discussed along with changes that are being implemented to address student concerns.