Editing and translating the Code civil in Belgium, 1804-2004
Editing and translating the Code civil in Belgium, 1804-2004
复制标题
比利时民法典的编辑和翻译，1804 年至 2004 年
DOI：
10.1163/1571819042872609
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
D. Heirbaut
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Heirbaut
比利时仍然有《法国民法》，尽管作出了一些努力，以新的编纂取代它。这听起来可能很奇怪，但随着时间的推移，这些都在减少，19世纪人们对新的、原始的比利时民法典的热情比21世纪初更高。因此，就私法而言，比利时在很长一段时间内仍将是一个“法国省”，尽管法典的变化逐渐削弱了法国法律的影响。最好的例子就是家庭法，从19世纪末起，拿破仑的家长制观念受到挑战，取而代之的是一个更民主的家庭组织3。有趣的是，新立法的灵感有时来自于对法律史的研究，这表明荷兰南部的许多地区，后来成为比利时，在法国民法出台之前就已经知道了一个更民主的家庭结构。这一变化过程的速度不应被夸大。事实上，大多数重大变化只发生在20世纪的最后几十年5，*摘要见下文，第228页。**本文是对A.Wijffels的前一篇文章的补充(见上文，第195-214页)。它是根据作者和教授在导演方面的经验写成的。嗯。杜兰特博士。G·贝特曼，比利时国民法典的前主席，这是比利时民法法典的累积版本，适用于Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht，这是对比利时私法的领先审查，其中包含1804年的原始文本以及后来在比利时以法语和荷兰语对其进行的所有修改。不用说，如果没有A.Wijffels，G.Baeteman和该版本的合作者的讨论和帮助，这篇文章是不可能写成的：G.van Dievoet，K.Swerts，X.Lesage，S.Brouwers，G.Verschelden，J.Gerlo，F.De Bock，F.Swennen，R.Barbai x，M.Coene，J.Baeck，F.Bruloot，Y.Leleu，F.Stevens，E.Stassijns，K.Marchand，S.Stallaert和ME Storme。
Belgium still has the French Code civil in spite of some efforts to replace it with a new codification. Strange as it may sound these have declined with time, there being more enthusiasm for a new, original and Belgian Civil Code in the 19th century than at the beginning of the 21st 1. Thus, as far as private law is concerned, Belgium will remain a'French province' 2 for a long time, though changes to the Code have gradually weakened the influence of French law. The best example of these is to be found in family law where from the end of the 19th century the Napoleonic patriarchal view of the family was challenged and replaced by a family with a more'democratic'organisation 3. Interestingly enough, the new legislation, at times, was inspired by research into legal history4, which showed that many regions of the Southern Netherlands, later to become Belgium, had known a more democratic family structure before the introduction of the French Code civil. The speed of this process of change should not be exaggerated. In fact, most of the major changes only took place in the last decades of the 20th century 5,* For a summary see below, p. 228.** This article was written as a complement to the previous article by A. Wijffels (supra, p. 195-214). It is based on the experiences of the author in directing, together with prof. em. dr. G. Baeteman, former president of the Belgian Conseil d'tat, a cumulative edition of the Code civil in Belgium for the Tijdschrift voor privaatrecht, the leading review of private law in Belgium, containing the original 1804 text and all later changes to it in Belgium, in both French and Dutch. Needless to say this article could not have been written without the discussions with and help received from A. Wijffels, G. Baeteman and the collaborators to the edition: G. van Dievoet, K. Swerts, X. Lesage, S. Brouwers, G. Verschelden, J. Gerlo, F. de Bock, F. Swennen, R. Barbaix, M. Coene, J. Baeck, F. Bruloot, Y. Leleu, F. Stevens, E. Stassijns, K. Marchand, S. Stallaert and ME Storme.