Development of an English-language version of a Japanese iPad application to facilitate collaborative goal setting in rehabilitation: a Delphi study and field test.
Development of an English-language version of a Japanese iPad application to facilitate collaborative goal setting in rehabilitation: a Delphi study and field test.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018908
复制
发表时间：
2018-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Sherrington AJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Levack W;Tomori K;Takahashi K;Sherrington AJ
这项研究旨在调查日语iPad应用程序的英文版本的内容，该应用程序旨在促进围绕康复目标设置的共享决策：辅助职业选择决策-英语(ADOC-E)。阶段1：Delphi方法与国际职业治疗专家小组就ADOC-E中的文本和图像达成共识。阶段2：测试住院康复和住院护理中卫生服务用户对ADOC-E中图像的正确识别(无提示和提示)。第一阶段：国际在线。第二阶段：新西兰的三项医疗服务--(1)创伤性脑损伤的住宅康复服务，(2)体弱老年人疗养院和(3)公立医院的住院康复病房。第一阶段：来自新西兰(4名)、澳大利亚(4名)、英国(2名)和美国(4名)的14名经验丰富的职业治疗师。第二阶段：24名康复和住宿护理服务使用者(10名男性，14名女性；20-95岁；简易精神状态考试成绩13-30分)。四轮德尔福回合需要与经验丰富的职业治疗师就ADOC-E的内容达成共识，最后是100个项目，涵盖人们从事的日常活动和他们参与的社会角色。超过80%的服务用户参与者可以在没有提示或提示的情况下正确识别95%(95/100)的ADOC-E项目。虽然ADOC-E中的一些更抽象的概念(与复杂的社会角色相关)不太可能被所有参与者正确识别，但ADOC-E的文本和图像被认为总体上适合用途，并为未来的临床测试做好准备。
This study aimed to investigate the content of an English-language version of a Japanese iPad application designed to facilitate shared decision-making around goal setting in rehabilitation: Aid for Decision-making in Occupational Choice—English (ADOC-E). Phase 1: Delphi methods to reach consensus with an international group of expert occupational therapists on the text and images in ADOC-E. Phase 2: Testing correct recognition (unprompted and prompted) of images in ADOC-E by health service users in inpatient rehabilitation and residential care. Phase 1: International, online. Phase 2: Three healthcare services in New Zealand—(1) a residential rehabilitation service for traumatic brain injury, (2) a nursing home for frail older adults and (3) an inpatient rehabilitation ward in a public hospital. Phase 1: Fourteen experienced occupational therapists from New Zealand (4), Australia (4), UK (2) and USA (4). Phase 2: Twenty-four rehabilitation and residential care service users (10 men, 14 women; 20–95 years; Mini-Mental State Exam scores 13–30). Four Delphi rounds were required to reach consensus with the experienced occupational therapists on the content of ADOC-E, ending with 100 items covering daily activities that people do and social roles they participate in. Ninety-five per cent (95/100) of ADOC-E items could each be correctly identified by over 80% of service user participants with either unprompted or prompted recognition. While a few of the more abstract concepts in ADOC-E (related to complex social roles) were less likely to be correctly recognised by all participants, the text and images ADOC-E were deemed to be fit for purpose overall and ready for future clinical testing.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Des Roches, Carrie A.;Balachandran, Isabel;Kiran, Swathi
通讯作者：
Kiran, Swathi
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Rand D;Zeilig G;Kizony R
通讯作者：
Kizony R
影响因子：
1
作者：
Kurland, Jacquie;Wilkins, Abigail R.;Stokes, Polly
通讯作者：
Stokes, Polly
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Kizony, Rachel;Zeilig, Gabi;Rand, Debbie
通讯作者：
Rand, Debbie
影响因子：
3
作者：
Playford, ED;Dawson, L;Wells, R
通讯作者：
Wells, R