Diagnostic criteria for DCD: Past and future
Diagnostic criteria for DCD: Past and future
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.010
复制
发表时间：
2015-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Geuze, Reint
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien;Schoemaker, Marina;Geuze, Reint
本综述的目的是收集有关作者在描述和选择DCD儿童时遵守DSM标准的情况。我们调查了过去5年（2010-2014年）发表的实验和干预研究中使用了哪些选择标准。对176篇论文的结果进行了总结。在此期间，对DSM标准的遵守情况有所改善。一般而言，使用标准化测试分数提供关于运动性能的详细信息，并报告截止值。方法部分对其他DSM标准的详细程度要低得多（即，运动协调问题是否干扰日常生活活动，以及如何检查智商、其他医疗条件或并发症）。如何新的DSM-5标准可以指定为临床和研究使用的意见进行了讨论。(C)2015 Elsevier B. V.版权所有。
The aim of this review was to gather information on how well authors comply to DSM criteria in their description and selection of children with DCD. We investigated which selection criteria were used in experimental and intervention studies published in the last 5 years (2010-2014). Results on 176 papers are summarized. Compliance to the DSM criteria has improved over this time period. In general, detailed information was provided on motor performance using standardized test scores and cut-off values are reported. Method sections were far less detailed about other DSM criteria (i.e., whether motor coordination problems interfered with activities of daily living and how IQ, other medical conditions or co-occurring disorders were checked). Views on how the new DSM-5 criteria could be specified for clinical and research use are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.