AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system

AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00586-015-3831-3
复制
发表时间:
2016-07-01
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Vialle, Luiz R.
Vialle, Luiz R.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vaccaro, Alexander R.;Koerner, John D.;Vialle, Luiz R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本项目描述了一个基于形态学的下颈椎创伤分类系统。采用与胸腰椎系统相同的方法,目标是开发一个全面而简单的分类系统,具有较高的观察者内和观察者间可靠性,可用于临床和研究。要求所有研究者在两次(间隔1个月)对另外30例病例进行分级之前,成功对10例病例进行分级,以证明对系统的理解。Kappa系数(kappa)计算观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。分类系统基于与TL系统相似的三种损伤形态类型:压迫性损伤(A)、张力带损伤(B)和平移性损伤(C),以及对小关节损伤的额外描述,以及患者特异性修饰符和神经功能状态。所有损伤亚型的观察者内和观察者间的可靠性都很高(kappa值分别为0.75和0.64)。AOSpine下颈椎损伤分类系统在初步评估中表现出了很高的可靠性,可以作为沟通、患者护理和研究目的的有价值的工具。
This project describes a morphology-based subaxial cervical spine traumatic injury classification system. Using the same approach as the thoracolumbar system, the goal was to develop a comprehensive yet simple classification system with high intra- and interobserver reliability to be used for clinical and research purposes.A subaxial cervical spine injury classification system was developed using a consensus process among clinical experts. All investigators were required to successfully grade 10 cases to demonstrate comprehension of the system before grading 30 additional cases on two occasions, 1 month apart. Kappa coefficients (kappa) were calculated for intraobserver and interobserver reliability.The classification system is based on three injury morphology types similar to the TL system: compression injuries (A), tension band injuries (B), and translational injuries (C), with additional descriptions for facet injuries, as well as patient-specific modifiers and neurologic status. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was substantial for all injury subtypes (kappa = 0.75 and 0.64, respectively).The AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system demonstrated substantial reliability in this initial assessment, and could be a valuable tool for communication, patient care and for research purposes.