Pneumoconiosis
Pneumoconiosis
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1742-1241.1957.tb00647.x
复制
发表时间:
1957-02
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
W. R. James
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. R. James
IN THE COURSE of a lifetime everyone inhales some dust. Under rural conditions atmospheric dust contamination is slight, but in the lungs of those who live in smoky cities, many minute accumulations of dust are found. The dust retained under these conditions causes little or no anatomical damage and, so far as is known, results in no disturbance of health. The term pneumoconiosis is not used in reference to such lung states. It is possible that urban atmospheric pollution may predispose to lung cancer and bronchitis, but a discussion of this possibility is outside the scope of the present paper. In some industrial processes the air may become heavily laden with dust. It has been known for centuries that workmen engaged in some of these processes are liable to develop lung damage. A comprehensive list of the hazardous industries is given by Doig (1949). The term pneumoconiosis is usually reserved for a condition of ill-health resulting from the inhalation of harmful dusts at work. Perusal of the literature shows that special meanings are sometimes attached to the term pneumoconiosis according to the experience of the author. The radiologist regards it as a lung abnormality capable of producing characteristic x-ray changes, and the pathologist considers it as an alteration of pulmonary anatomy due to the effects of inhaled dust. For legislative purposes, Parliament has used pathological criteria in defining pneumoconiosis as " fibrosis of the lungs due to silica dust, asbestos dust or other dust and includes the condition known as dust reticulation" (National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act, 1946, 57, 3)' Experience has shown that some dusts encountered in industry are relatively harmless whilst others may cause rapidly fatal lung disease. It has been observed that workmen in sawmills, cement works and limestone quarries may tolerate dusty conditions for many years without contracting lung disease. In contrast, occupations involving exposure to dusts rich in free silica (Si02) carry a serious risk of ill-health. It is of interest that dusts containing silicon (Si) chemically combined as silicates are in general much less harmful than those which contain , free' silica as silicon dioxide. With few exceptions, it can be shown that the risk of serious pneumoconiosis increases with a rise in the silica content of the dust.