Evaluating the Construct Validity of Objective Personality Tests Using a Multitrait-Multimethod-Multioccasion-(MTMM-MO)-Approach

Evaluating the Construct Validity of Objective Personality Tests Using a Multitrait-Multimethod-Multioccasion-(MTMM-MO)-Approach
复制标题

使用多特征、多方法、多场合 (MTMM-MO) 方法评估客观人格测试的构造有效性

DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000212
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Schmitt
Schmitt
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ortner;Caspers;Schmitt

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

虽然客观人格测验(OPTS)在心理学和心理测评领域有着悠久的历史,但其效度和信度尚未得到充分的研究。在这项研究中,我们检验了客观(人格)测验、内隐联想测验(IATS)和自我报告测验用于评估责任心和智力的收敛和区分效度。此外,使用Courvoisier,Nussbeck,Eid和Cole(2008)提出的多方法潜伏状态-特质(MM-LST)模型在特质(稳定)和特定时机(瞬间)水平上评估了这些测量的收敛和区分效度。367名学生在三个不同的测量场合进行了评估,数据被纳入其中。结果表明,OPTS与其他方法获得的数据的收敛程度普遍较低。其他分析表明,所使用的OPT评估的是结构的稳定组成部分,而不是瞬时组成部分。不同测试的可靠性从。54%至54%。95.此外,大量的特质方法特异性表明,不同的方法评估OPTS和其他测量之间不共享的特质成分。客观问责性测试的效标效度数据显示,它与考生在实验室的守时有关。
Although Objective Personality Tests (OPTs) have a long history in psychology and the field of psychological assessment, their validity, and reliability have not yet been sufficiently studied. In this study, we examined the convergent and discriminant validity of objective (personality) tests, Implicit Association Tests (IATs), and self-report measures for the assessment of conscientiousness and intelligence. Moreover, the convergent and discriminant validity of these measures was assessed on the trait (stable) and occasion specific (momentary) level by using the multimethod latent state-trait (MM-LST) model proposed by Courvoisier, Nussbeck, Eid, and Cole (2008) which allows for the decomposition of different sources of variance. Data from 367 students assessed on three different measurement occasions was incorporated. Results indicate generally low convergence of OPTs with data gained by other approaches. Additional analyses revealed that the OPTs used assess stable rather than momentary components of the constructs. Reliabilities of different tests ranged from. 54 to. 95. Furthermore, a substantial amount of trait method specificity revealed that different methods assess trait components that are not shared between OPTs and other measures. Data on the criterion validity of the objective conscientiousness test revealed that it is related to the punctuality of test takers in the laboratory.