A plea for the "de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration
A plea for the "de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129
复制
发表时间：
2016-10-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Dahinden, Janine
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dahinden, Janine
在过去几十年中，移徙和融合研究已经制度化。然而，越来越多的声音一直在呼吁更多的反身性，批评民族国家和种族为中心的认识论，往往通知这一学科。与这种推理相一致，我认为，移民和融合的研究起源于一个历史上制度化的民族国家移民机构，从而纠缠在一个特定的正常化话语。因此，这一领域的研究有助于再现这一特定的迁移工具的类别。这种纠缠为这一研究传统带来了一些严重的困境，这些困境需要进一步考虑和可能的解决方案。本文的主要命题是对移民与融合研究进行去移民化。我概述了这样做的可能途径，并讨论了未来的移民和融合研究这样一个战略的后果。
Migration and integration research has been institutionalized over the last few decades. However, an increasing number of voices has been calling for more reflexivity, criticizing the nation-state- and ethnicity-centred epistemology that often informs this discipline. Consistently with this line of reasoning, I argue that migration and integration research originates in a historically institutionalized nation-state migration apparatus and is thus entangled with a particular normalization discourse. Therefore, this field of study contributes to reproducing the categories of this particular migration apparatus. This entanglement poses some serious dilemmas for this research tradition, dilemmas that ask for further consideration and possible solutions. My main proposition is to de-migranticize' migration and integration research. I outline possible ways of doing so and discuss the consequences of such a strategy for the future of migration and integration studies.