A proof-theoretic analysis of collection

A proof-theoretic analysis of collection
复制标题

集合的证明理论分析

DOI:
10.1007/s001530050099
复制
发表时间:
1998
影响因子:
0.3
通讯作者:
L. Beklemishev
L. Beklemishev
中科院分区:
数学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Beklemishev

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要。由Paris和Friedman的结果,集合公理模式为 $\Sigma_{n+1}$公式, $B\Sigma_{n+1}$,是 $\Pi_{n+2}$保守的 $I\Sigma_n$。给出了这个定理的一个新的证明理论证明,它是基于约简的 $B\Sigma_n$的一个版本的集合规则和随后的分析这一规则通过赫布兰德的定理。这种方法的推广使我们能够改进基于反射原理的已知结果 $B\Sigma_n$和回答一些由Sieg[23]和Hájek[9]留下的技术问题。我们也给出了一个新的独立性的证明 $B\Sigma_{n+1}$结束 $I\Sigma_n$通过直接递归理论论证,并回答Gaifman和Dimitracopoulos b[8]提出的一个开放问题。
Abstract. By a result of Paris and Friedman, the collection axiom schema for $\Sigma_{n+1}$ formulas, $B\Sigma_{n+1}$, is $\Pi_{n+2}$ conservative over $I\Sigma_n$. We give a new proof-theoretic proof of this theorem, which is based on a reduction of $B\Sigma_n$ to a version of collection rule and a subsequent analysis of this rule via Herbrand's theorem. A generalization of this method allows us to improve known results on reflection principles for $B\Sigma_n$ and to answer some technical questions left open by Sieg [23] and Hájek [9]. We also give a new proof of independence of $B\Sigma_{n+1}$ over $I\Sigma_n$ by a direct recursion-theoretic argument and answer an open problem formulated by Gaifman and Dimitracopoulos [8].