RADIATION ONCOLOGY GREATER AREA DATABASE (ROGAD): CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF HEAD AND NECK

RADIATION ONCOLOGY GREATER AREA DATABASE (ROGAD): CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF HEAD AND NECK
复制标题

放射肿瘤学大区数据库 (ROGAD):头颈部临床分析

DOI:
10.11182/jastro1989.12.337
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Nishio
M. Nishio
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takehiro Inoue;K. Inamura;H. Harauchi;Y. Ando;T. Umeda;T. Teshima;Y. Nagata;Y. Hishikawa;K. Fukuhisa;K. Kawachi;M. Nishio

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们分析了日本放射肿瘤学大区域数据库(ROGAD)中头颈癌的临床数据。从ROGAD的第2次到第7次研究,总共登记了8,950名患者。在ICD-O中,编码数C00.0 ~ C14.8和30.0 ~ 32.9被认为是头颈癌。本研究对1311例头颈癌患者的临床资料进行了评估。在ROGAD登记的患者中,有17-18%的TNM分类和分期项目被清空。百分之十五的鳞状细胞癌患者在没有分期信息的情况下接受治疗。这个全国性数据库最重要的问题是数据的质量。
We analyze the clinical data of the head and neck cancer in the Radiation Oncology Greater Area Database (ROGAD) in Japan. From the 2nd to 7th study of the ROGAD, a total of 8,950 patients were registered. In ICD-O, coding numbers of from C00.0 to C14.8 and from 30.0 to 32.9 were considered as head and neck cancer. Clinical data of 1,311 patients with head and neck cancer were evaluated in this study. Among the patients registered in the ROGAD, 17-18% of all items of TNM classification and stage were emptied. Fifteen percent of the patients with squamous cell cancer were treated without the information of the stage. The most important problem of this national-wide database is the quality of the data.