Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer
Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.26025
复制
发表时间:
2018-11-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Turkbey, Baris
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gaur, Sonia;Harmon, Stephanie;Turkbey, Baris
BackgroundPurposeProstate Imaging-Reporting and Data System v. 2 (PI-RADSv2) provides standardized nomenclature for interpretation of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Inclusion of additional features for categorization may provide benefit to stratification of disease.To prospectively compare PI-RADSv2 to a qualitative in-house system for detecting prostate cancer on mpMRI.Study TypePopulationProspective.In all, 338 patients who underwent mpMRI May 2015-May 2016, with subsequent MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy.Field StrengthAssessment3T mpMRI (T2W, diffusion-weighted [DW], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map, b-2000 DWI acquisition, and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI).One genitourinary radiologist prospectively read mpMRIs using both in-house and PI-RADSv2 5-category systems.Statistical TestResultsIn lesion-based analysis, overall and clinically significant (CS) tumor detection rates (TDR) were calculated for all PI-RADSv2 and in-house categories. The ability of each scoring system to detect cancer was assessed by area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Within each PI-RADSv2 category, lesions were further stratified by their in-house categories to determine if TDRs can be increased by combining features of both systems.In 338 patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 6.5 [0.6-113.6] ng/mL; age 64 [44-84] years), 733 lesions were identified (47% tumor-positive). Predictive abilities of both systems were comparable for all (AUC 76-78%) and CS cancers (AUCs 79%). The in-house system had higher overall and CS TDRs than PI-RADSv2 for categories 3 and 4 (P