The Positive Transitions Model for Sport Retirement
The Positive Transitions Model for Sport Retirement
复制标题
体育退休的积极转变模型
DOI:
10.1002/j.2161-1882.2001.tb00186.x
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Henderson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christopher E. Stankovich;Darin J. Meeker;J. Henderson
Positive Transitions for Student Athletes is a program designed to address the psychosocial and career-related issues surrounding the inevitable sport retirement transition faced by the majority of collegiate athletes. A rationale for the development of sport retirement programs is provided, as is the Positive Transitions program and outcome data. Many student athletes dream of playing professional sports on completion of their collegiate careers; however, most are deselected and are therefore left to redefine their personal identity. Faced with a transition because of forced retirement from sports (or separation from sport participation), they must pursue a career that does not involve participation in sports. Historically, the unique career termination issues of athletes have received little attention from researchers. This lack of focus on college athletes is unfortunate because only approximately 1% of all student athletes advance to any level of professional sport (Figler & Figler, 1984). Furthermore, only approximately 2% of all college football players will play in the National Football League (National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA], 1998). However, football is only one example of a sport with potential retirement difficulties. The odds of achieving professional status in other sports are even lower than the odds of playing professional football. Only 50 of 500,000 college basketball players advance to the National Basketball Association (NCAA, 1998). As a result, most student athletes, regardless of sport, gender, or race, are vulnerable to an abrupt and difficult transition when active participation in sports is no longer an option. Some researchers have viewed student athletes as "a group of young people who, as a function of their shared athletic experience, encounter atypical demands and pressures that often challenge the course of their personal development and well-being" (Etzel, Ferrante, & Pinkney, 1996, p. 1). Involvement in intercollegiate sports may not facilitate the accomplishment of the career-related developmental tasks that college students normally achieve (Brown, 1993; Bulling, 1993). Brown found that athletes who chose sport careers, as well as athletes as a group, scored significantly lower in the areas of career maturity, career decision making, world-of-work information, and knowledge of preferred occupational group. Blann (1985) reported that student athletes at a high level of competition were less able to formulate mature educational and career plans than were college students in general. Athletes who are separating from participation in sports face trauma and disruption in their lives, as well as experiencing a number of physical and psychological effects of sport retirement. These effects include loss of appetite, weight fluctuation, skipped menstrual cycles, insomnia, mood changes, a sense of being out of control, sadness about the loss of teammates, decline in motivation, and a lack of trust in others (Blinde & Stratta, 1993). The implications of having an identity based exclusively on athletics have also been investigated. Several studies have indicated that athletes with a strong, exclusive athletic identity seem to be most at risk for emotional disturbance on termination of the athletic career (Baillie & Danish, 1992; Brewer, 1993; Ogilivie & Howe, 1982; Pearson & Petitpas, 1990; Werthner & Orlick, 1986). In other words, athletes who see little or no self-worth in their abilities beyond athletics may be in jeopardy of lagging behind nonathletes when competing for future career opportunities. Research, however, has described the impact of several mediating variables regarding sport retirement, including athletic identity (Brewer, Van Raalte, & Linder, 1993), achievement satisfaction (Werthner & Orlick, 1986), role confusion (Coakley, 1978), self-efficacy (Luzzo, 1993), and career maturity (Kennedy & Dimick, 1987). …