A CRITIQUE OF CROSS-LAGGED CORRELATION
A CRITIQUE OF CROSS-LAGGED CORRELATION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.245
复制
发表时间：
1980-01-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
ROGOSA, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ROGOSA, D
评论说，交叉滞后相关（CLC）是不是一个有用的程序，纵向面板数据的分析。特别是，CLC之间的差异不是因果推理的可靠基础。CLC失效的证明主要基于2波、2变量纵向板设计的结果。将这些结果扩展到具有多个波和多个测量的面板揭示了其他问题;每个2波快照都没有产生可靠的结果。总的来说，2波分析往往是矛盾和误导的。(33参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Comments that cross-lagged correlation (CLC) is not a useful procedure for the analysis of longitudinal panel data. In particular, the difference between CLCs is not a sound basis for causal inference. Demonstrations of the failure of CLC are based mainly on results for the 2-wave, 2-variable longitudinal panel design. Extensions of these results to panels with multiple waves and multiple measures reveal additional problems; each 2-wave snapshot did not yield dependable results. Taken together, the 2-wave analyses were often contradictory and misleading.(33 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)