Neuromuscular effects of impulse pattern in a crustacean motoneuron.
Neuromuscular effects of impulse pattern in a crustacean motoneuron.
复制标题
甲壳动物运动神经元脉冲模式的神经肌肉效应。
DOI:
10.1152/jn.1969.32.4.607
复制
发表时间:
1969
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
D. Kennedy
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. L. Gillary;D. Kennedy
MATERIALS AND METHODSCrayfish were prepared as described in the previous# paper (4). The superficial branch of the third root on either side of ganglion 2, 3, or 4 was stimulated and recorded from with suction electrodes having tip diameters approximately equal to the diameter of the nerve trunk. A recording electrode was attached to the distal portion of the nerve before it entered the superficial flexor muscle. The signal was led to a low-level capacitance-coupled preamplifier and then displayed on an oscilloscope in order to monitor impulse activity in the nerve. A second suction electrode was nlacedon the central end of the nerve for stimulation by brief (0.1 msec) square pulses from an electronic stimulator. The motoneuron of interest here has the largest axon of the six which run in the nerve trunk, and since it often had the lowest threshold it could be stimulated selectively. At the beginning of an experiment, activity in this motoneuron was evoked by natural stimulation. Its amplitude was then used to verify that an evoked centrifugal volley contained only impulses from the largest motoneuron. This could also be confirmed bv conduction-velocity measurements. The nerve was then crushed at its exit point from the cord to block spontaneous efferent impulses in the smaller, tonic motoneurons. Junctional potentials were recorded from lateral superficial flexor muscle fibers using KCl-filled glass microelectrodes of about 15 megohms impedance. Signals were led to a high-impedance dc amplifier(Bioelectric Instruments, Inc.) and then to a multitrace oscilloscope. Contraction of the muscle was measured with an RCA 5734 transducer. The moving anode of the tube was connected to a pair of forceps which gripped the soft exoskeleton near one point of attachment of the superficial flexor fibers. The output was approximately