Definable Conditionals

Definable Conditionals
复制标题

可定义的条件

DOI:
10.1007/s11245-020-09704-3
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Topoi
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

自Stalnaker和刘易斯提出条件句以来,对条件句的严格分析不仅在哲学文献中占据了主导地位,而且还进入了语言学和心理学领域。然而,刘易斯-斯塔尔纳克的解释的缺点引发了大量的修改,如非空条件句,预设指示,完美条件句或其他条件结构,例如:原因关系,差异制造条件句,反事实依赖或概率相关性。这些新的连接词中有许多可以被看作是加强或弱化的条件句。它们是可定义的条件句。本文开发了一种技术,从底层定义条件的已知逻辑中推断这种可定义条件的逻辑。该技术适用于中央的例子。结果表明,条件句的动物园的很大一部分来自一个基本的条件句-一个恒定的核心不同的上下文和概念的变化,严格条件句。
The variably strict analysis of conditionals does not only largely dominate the philosophical literature, since its invention by Stalnaker and Lewis, it also found its way into linguistics and psychology. Yet, the shortcomings of Lewis–Stalnaker’s account initiated a plethora of modifications, such as non-vacuist conditionals, presuppositional indicatives, perfect conditionals, or other conditional constructions, for example: reason relations, difference-making conditionals, counterfactual dependency, or probabilistic relevance. Many of these new connectives can be treated as strengthened or weakened conditionals. They aredefinable conditionals. This article develops a technique to infer the logic for such definable conditionals from the known logic of the underlying defining conditional. The technique is applied to central examples. The results show that a large part of the zoo of conditionals arises from a basic conditional—a constant nucleus of the different contextual and conceptual variations of variably strict conditionals.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊: The Review of Symbolic Logic
影响因子: --
作者:
H. Leitgeb
通讯作者: H. Leitgeb
反事实条件句的三种逻辑的完整性和可判定性1
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Lewis
通讯作者: D. Lewis
大卫·梅金森谈非经典问题的经典方法
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Hansson
通讯作者: S. Hansson
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: Journal of Logic, Language and Information
影响因子: --
作者:
K. Krzyżanowska;S. Wenmackers;I. Douven
通讯作者: I. Douven
反 DOXA 条件的完整性 – 使用排名语义
DOI: 10.1017/s1755020318000199
发表时间: 2019
期刊: The Review of Symbolic Logic
影响因子: --
作者:
通讯作者: --