Chronic total occlusion of infarct-related artery: A bystander or a risk factor of electrical storm?
Chronic total occlusion of infarct-related artery: A bystander or a risk factor of electrical storm?
复制标题
梗塞相关动脉慢性完全闭塞:旁观者还是雷暴的危险因素?
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.016
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Dobrev Dobromir
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tsuji Yukiomi;Dobrev Dobromir
Electrical storm (ES), generally defined as≥ 3 ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) events within 24 h, is a major complication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. This develops in a variety of structural heart diseases including ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction (MI) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy [1, 2]. Ischemic cardiomyopathy is the most prevalent disorder predisposing to ES and acute ischemic events are a well-known factor to initiate ES [1, 2]. However, coronary arterial abnormalities detected by angiography relate to ES are not well-established. In this issue of Int J Cardiol Faga et al.[3] demonstrated in a large-scale multicenter cohort study that chronic total occlusion (CTO) of infarct-related artery (IRA-CTO) that was not revascularized independently predicted the occurrence of ES. The authors also showed a novel risk-prediction model of ES, which comprises of 3 categories including IRA-CTO, prior ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction< 38%.A CTO, which is detected in approximately 20% of patients with coronary artery disease, can clearly provide a vulnerable substrate for ventricular arrhythmias. There are several clinical studies in ICD recipients for the primary and/or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) reporting that CTO is an independent predictor for the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapies [4] and has an adverse impact on long-term mortality [[5],[6],[7]]. Moreover, IRA-CTO is more arrhythmogenic compared to CTO which is not associated with a prior infarction in their territory (non-IRA-CTO): patients with IRA-CTO had a higher proportion of appropriate ICD therapies than those with non-IRA-CTO [8]. A review article by Assaf et al. has assessed the association between CTO and VAs, along with the putative underlying mechanism [9]. Scar-related VT usually is caused by anatomically determined macro-reentrant circuits that develop after MI. Small strands of surviving myocardium create zones of slow and anisotropic conduction in the scar area or in the border zone between scar and normal myocardium, which are critical parts for the evolution of the scar-related reentrant circuit. A territory of IRA-CTO has a larger scar border zone than that of infarct-related artery without CTO and it immediately decreases after CTO revascularization [9]. Scar remodeling, characterized by dynamic changes in the scar size and its components of border zone and core zone as well as number of border zone channels defined as continuous corridors of border zone surrounding by scar core that connect to 2 areas of healthy tissue, starts to develop within the first 6 months after the onset of MI and lasts over a 4-year period with a persistent increase in repolarization heterogeneity [10]. In addition, the majority of CTO patients have ischemic fraction flow reserve, even those with well-developed collateral vessels, that causes chronic ischemia-induced myocardial adaptation termed hibernation [9]. This exhibits abnormal and heterogeneous electrical properties and contributes to the formation of a substrate for reentry, which likely contributes to the higher vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias and SCD [9].