Shopping in the Public Realm: A Law of Place
Shopping in the Public Realm: A Law of Place
复制标题
公共领域购物：地方法则
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00513.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Layard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Layard
通过一个位于布里斯托的案例研究，本文探讨了“场所法则”如何将多个异质的城市中心空间转化为单一的同质化和商品化的私人零售场所。借鉴德·塞尔托、列费夫尔和包括杜安在内的人文地理学家的经验，本文探讨了法律如何通过对私有财产的传统理解，依靠总体规划、强制购买和封锁高速公路的技术，促进空间和时间的封闭。它表明，地方法利用二元空间和概念上的区别，显然将地方与空间分开，在一条往往看不见的边界线的两侧适用不同的法律的规则。这篇文章质疑这种法律上便利的空间和概念上的封闭，特别是因为它限制了公共领域内的空间实践。它的结论是拒绝城市的“漫游权”，认为它没有足够的变革性，而是呼吁对列费夫尔的“城市权”进行更广泛的解释。
Through a case study based in Bristol, this article explores how the ‘law of place’ has transformed multiple heterogeneous city centre spaces into a single homogeneous and commodified privately owned retail site. Drawing on de Certeau, Lefebvre, and humanistic geographers including Tuan, the article explores how law facilitates spatial and temporal enclosure through conventional understandings of private property, relying on techniques of masterplanning, compulsory purchase, and stopping up highways. It suggests that the law of place draws on binary spatial and conceptual distinctions to apparently separate places from spaces, applying different legal rules either side of an often invisible boundary line. The article questions this legally facilitated spatial and conceptual enclosure, particularly as it restricts spatial practices within the public realm. It concludes by rejecting an urban ‘right to roam’ as insufficiently transformative, calling for a broader interpretation of Lefebvre's ‘right to the city’ instead.