Muscularity concerns among men: development of attitudinal and perceptual measures.
Muscularity concerns among men: development of attitudinal and perceptual measures.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.01.001
复制
发表时间：
2004-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Schlundt, David G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hildebrandt, Tom;Langenbucher, Jim;Schlundt, David G
当前的研究报告了包含瘦削和肌肉维度的身材评级量表的开发和心理测量学，以及评估与肌肉畸形 (MD) 相关症状的 13 项调查问卷。三个独立的男性和女性样本完成了肌肉变形障碍量表 (MDDI)、健美运动员形象网格 (BIG) 或两者，以测量 1 周重测可靠性、内部一致性、收敛和发散有效性以及 BIG 数字沿身体脂肪和瘦肌肉质量的区间尺度的有效放置。 MDDI 和 MDDI 子量表（体型驱动、外观不耐受和功能障碍）具有良好的信度、内部一致性、收敛效度和发散效度。 BIG 具有良好至优秀的重测信度、良好的收敛效度和发散效度以及区间量表的效度。讨论了表征男性身体意象障碍的意义以及这些措施的好处和局限性。
The current study reports the development and psychometrics of a figure rating scale with leanness and muscularity dimensions and a 13-item questionnaire assessing symptoms associated with muscle dysmorphia (MD). Three separate samples of men and women completed the muscle dysmorphic disorder inventory (MDDI), the bodybuilder image grid (BIG) or both to measure 1-week test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity and valid placement of BIG figures along interval scales of body fat and lean muscle mass. The MDDI and MDDI subscales (drive for size, appearance intolerance, and functional impairment) had good reliability, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. The BIG had good to excellent test-retest reliability, good convergent and divergent validity and validity as an interval scale. Implications for characterizing body image disturbance in men and benefits and limitations of the measures are discussed.