The revision of the Pliocene Mogi flora, described by Nathorst (1883) and Florin (1920)

The revision of the Pliocene Mogi flora, described by Nathorst (1883) and Florin (1920)
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1976-09
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Tanai
T. Tanai
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Tanai

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

莫吉菲奥拉最早由Nathorst(1883年)和弗洛林(i920年)描述,是基于1879年瑞典织女星考察队在九州长崎附近收集的标本。作者重新调查了所有原始标本,这些标本保存在斯德哥尔摩的瑞典自然奇斯托里博物馆。这些标本大多保存完好,脉序特征良好,尽管它们是叶印记。通过对它们的调查,结合我们从同一地区采集的其他标本,确定了52种可鉴定的物种,隶属于31科40属。除水杉外,其余均为木本双子叶植物,主要由落叶阔叶树组成。、Pkegus为优势种,核桃属、Ckerpinus属、Zelkova属、枫香属、花椒属、枫香属、枫香属、花椒属、宏属、安息香属、梧桐属、柿属常见。一些常绿植物,如nex、Elaecarpus和Symplocos,尽管不常见,但也包含在其中。与化石植物相关的活物种中,很大一部分是居住在日本中西部海拔300米至800米的落叶阔叶林中的居民。与活林的比较认为,莫吉菲奥拉可能是Ge,Ple,S,e元t,g,Thl,‘9,W,e,E,i,i:Ge,zg,t,ltg’P“,i:ill,?,W.hZ`,ft?fl‘;AR,O.M.ihr,C8.a?`6Tli8.Caklga,T8,’2d.lga.`,Es,OO-20。含植物的沉积物没有海洋迹象,年龄评估主要基于植物化石。时代讨论的结论是,莫吉植物群的时代是上新世晚期,目前的系统重新调查是本文的最后一章。
The Mogi fiora, first described by Nathorst (1883) and then by Florin (i920), was based on the specimens collected by the Swedish Vega Expedition in 1879 near Nagasaki, Kyushu. The author reinvestigated all the original specimens, which are deposited in the Swedish Museum of Natural Kistory in Stockholm. These specimens are mostly well-preserved in the fine venation character, though they are leaf impressions. Through investigating them together with our additional specimens from the same locality, the author confirms 52 identifiable species, which are composed of 31 families and 40 genera. All of them are woody dicots excepting for Metasequoia, and are composed mostly of deciduous broad-leaved trees. ,Pkegus is most predominant in number of specimens, and Juglans, Ckerpinus, Zelkova, Liquidambar, Sorbus, PVisteria, Zanthoxylum, Acer, Styrax, Tilia and Diospyros are common. A few evergreens such as nex, Elaeocarpus and Symplocos are contained, although not common. A large proportion of the living species related to the fossil plants are inhabitants of the deciduous broad-leaved forests in central and western Japan at altitudes of 300 up to 800 meters. The comparison with the living forests concludes that the Mogi fiora probably ge,Ple,S,e¥t,g,thl,'9,W,e,E,i,i:ge,,Zg,?t,ltg' P.",i:ill,?,W.hZ`,,ft?fl';.ar,O.M.ihr,C8.a?`6Tli8.Caklga,t8,'2d.lga.`,eS, index of OO to -20. The piant-bearing sediments have no marine indications, and the age evaluation has been based principally on plant fossils. The age discussion concludes that the Mogi flora is Late Pliocene in age, based on the current systematic reinvestigation which forms the final chapter of this article.