Fossil Versus Nonfossil CO Sources in the US: New Airborne Constraints From ACT‐America and GEM
Fossil Versus Nonfossil CO Sources in the US: New Airborne Constraints From ACT‐America and GEM
复制标题
美国化石与非化石二氧化碳来源:ACT–America 和 GEM 的新空气传播限制
DOI:
10.1029/2021gl093361
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Gvakharia, Alexander
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gonzalez, Andres;Millet, Dylan B.;Yu, Xueying;Wells, Kelley C.;Griffis, Timothy J.;Baier, Bianca C.;Campbell, Patrick C.;Choi, Yonghoon;DiGangi, Joshua P.;Gvakharia, Alexander
Carbon monoxide (CO) is an ozone precursor, oxidant sink, and widely used pollution tracer. The importance of anthropogenic versus other CO sources in the US is uncertain. Here, we interpret extensive airborne measurements with an atmospheric model to constrain US fossil and nonfossil CO sources. Measurements reveal a low bias in the simulated CO background and a 30% overestimate of US fossil CO emissions in the 2016 National Emissions Inventory. After optimization we apply the model for source partitioning. During summer, regional fossil sources account for just 9%–16% of the sampled boundary layer CO, and 32%–38% of the North American enhancement—complicating use of CO as a fossil fuel tracer. The remainder predominantly reflects biogenic hydrocarbon oxidation plus fires. Fossil sources account for less domain‐wide spatial variability at this time than nonfossil and background contributions. The regional fossil contribution rises in other seasons, and drives ambient variability downwind of urban areas.