Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management - A comparative real life study
Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management - A comparative real life study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.trf.2008.04.003
复制
发表时间：
2008-11-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Hjalmdahl, Magnus
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adell, Emeli;Varhelyi, Andras;Hjalmdahl, Magnus
ISA（智能速度适应）现场实验分别于2003年和2004年在匈牙利和西班牙进行。每个国家的 20 辆私家车配备了两种系统：(1) 通过主动加速踏板 (AAP) 提供支持，(2) 在超过速度限制时通过蜂鸣信号和闪烁红灯发出警告 (BEEP)。测试驾驶员驾驶了一个月，每辆车都安装了这两个系统。所有车辆的速度都会被持续记录，测试驾驶员也会接受采访，了解他们对系统的接受程度和体验。结果表明，两个系统均降低了平均速度和 85% 速度，但 AAP 更有效。移除这些系统后，速度并没有产生长期影响。试用后，一半的驾驶员愿意保留 ISA 系统，但更多的驾驶员希望保留 BEEP 系统，尽管它的满意度低于 AAP。结果表明，尽管人们认为匈牙利的工作量高于西班牙，但各国之间没有重大差异。 (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
Field experiments with ISA (intelligent speed adaptation) were carried out in Hungary and Spain in 2003 and 2004, respectively. Twenty private vehicles in each country were equipped with two kinds of systems: (1) support via an active accelerator pedal (AAP) and (2) warning via beep signals and a flashing red light when the speed limit was exceeded (BEEP). The test drivers drove for a month with both systems installed in each car. Speed was continually logged in all the vehicles and the test drivers were interviewed about their acceptance and experiences of the systems. The results show that both systems reduced the mean and 85 percentile speeds, but that the AAP was more effective. There was no long-lasting effect on speeds when the systems were removed. After the trial half of the drivers were willing to keep an ISA system, but more drivers wanted to keep the BEEP-system even though it showed lower satisfaction ratings than the AAP. The results indicate no major differences between the countries despite the workload being perceived to be higher in Hungary than in Spain. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.