Discussion: Some comments on the potential carcinogenicity of the clinically useful antitumor agents
Discussion: Some comments on the potential carcinogenicity of the clinically useful antitumor agents
复制标题
讨论:对临床上有用的抗肿瘤药物潜在致癌性的一些评论
作者:
S. Sieber;R. Adamson
T IS CLEAR T H A T THERE IS INCREASING CONI cern about the possibility that chemotherapy may play a role in the etiology of second primary tumors in cancer patients. However, before a causal relationship can be established between antineoplastic agents and these second tumors, additional basic experimental data must be acquired. Dr. Marquardt has summarized the utility of in uitro screening systems for this purpose, and Drs. Weisburger and Schmzhl have presented data obtained from rodent bioassays on the carcinogenicity of clinically useful antitumor agents. In studies initiated at our laboratory several years ago, we are using nonhuman primates, primarily rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys, to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of various antitumor agents. To date, both procarbazine and methylnitrosourea (MNU) have proved to be potent carcinogens (Table 1 ). Procarbazine has induced neoplasms in 18% of treated monkeys after an average latent period of 6.5 years, and six of the 10 malignancies that developed were acute leukemia. MNU induced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx in 11% of monkeys receiving this agent for an average of 6 years. Studies with the other agents, Adriamycin, 1-PAM (melphalan) and Imuran have only recently been initiated, and none of the treated monkeys have as yet developed tumors. We are also trying to establish in monkeys whether there is a threshold carcinogenic dose for the known hepatocarcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DENA). Five groups of monkeys are receiving biweekly intraperitoneal injections of DENA at doses ranging from 40 to 1 mg/kg. In the three groups of monkeys in which tumors have developed, we have found that the latent period increases as the mg/kg dose decreases; furthermore, a total DENA dose between 1.2