The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations
The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations
复制标题
抵抗的认识论：性别和种族压迫、认知不公正和抵抗想象
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
José Medina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
José Medina
前言：不敏感和失明。A.异议的重要性和认知互动的必要性B.抵抗、困惑和多视角主义C.概述第1章。主动无知、认知他人和认知摩擦1.1。主动无知与特权阶层的认知恶习被压迫者的清醒与认识美德抵抗、认知责任和认知摩擦的调节原则。抵抗是认知的罪恶还是认知的美德。认知权威的过度及其导致的不敏感2.1.1。作为互动、比较和对比的认识正义不同的权威、系统的不公正与社会想象回避认知摩擦的弊端、解释学的不公正与元盲问题。2.3. 争取开放思想：作为元盲目性纠正的认知摩擦和认知对位。强加的沉默和共同的解释学责任沉默与认知不公正的交际方法3.2。交际多元主义与解释学不公正3.3。我们对多重公众的解释学责任认知责任和有罪的无知负责任的机构、知识/无知和社会不公正压迫条件下的责任背叛：社会情境性、互联性与有罪无知猪头，燃烧的十字架和车钥匙认知懒惰的社会划分4.4.d .忽视差异。社会关系的盲目性与关联困境重叠的不敏感，文化指责和第三世界妇女的性别暴力。元明晰，知识英雄，和日常斗争的知识正义5.1。在压迫条件下履行自己的责任：元明晰5.2。促进清醒与社会变革呼应：连锁行动、“认知英雄”和社交网络5.3.1。胡安娜·伊内斯·德拉克鲁兹：认知勇气，批判性想象和认知摩擦。罗莎·帕克斯：反表演，连锁代理和社会网络。抵抗想象力和激进团结6.1。多元抵抗社区6.2。规范多元主义与激进团结认知摩擦和反叛谱系6.4。游击式多元主义、反记忆和无知的认识论抗拒想象：走向万花筒般的社会情感结论：网络团结参考文献
Acknowledgements Foreword: Insensitivity and Blindness Introduction. Resistance, Democratic Sensibilities, and the Cultivation of Perplexity A. The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Epistemic Interaction B. Resistance, Perplexity, and Multiperspectivalism C. Overview Chapter 1. Active Ignorance, Epistemic Others, and Epistemic Friction 1.1. Active Ignorance and the Epistemic Vices of the Privileged 1.2. Lucidity and the Epistemic Virtues of the Oppressed 1.3. Resistance, Epistemic Responsibility, and the Regulative Principles of Epistemic Friction Chapter 2. Resistance as Epistemic Vice and as Epistemic Virtue 2.1. The Excess of Epistemic Authority and the Resulting Insensitivity 2.1.1. Epistemic Justice as Interactive, Comparative and Contrastive 2.1.2. Differential Authority, Systematic Injustice, and the Social Imaginary 2.2. The Vice of Avoiding Epistemic Friction, Hermeneuticalal Injustice, and the Problem of Meta-Blindness. 2.3. Striving for Open-Mindedness: Epistemic Friction and Epistemic Counterpoints as Correctives of Meta-Blindness Chapter 3. Imposed Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities 3.1. Silences and the Communicative Approach to Epistemic Injustice 3.2. Communicative Pluralism and Hermeneutical Injustice 3.3. Our Hermeneutical Responsibilities with respect to Multiple Publics Chapter 4. Epistemic Responsibility and Culpable Ignorance 4.1. Responsible Agency, Knowledge/Ignorance, and Social Injustice 4.2. Betraying One's Responsibilities under Conditions of Oppression: Social Contextuality, Interconnectedness, and Culpable Ignorance 4.2.A. Pig Heads, Burning Crosses, and Car keys 4.2.B. The Social Division of Cognitive Laziness 4.2.C. Blindness to Differences 4.2.D. Blindness to Social Relationality and the Relevance Dilemma 4.3. Overlapping Insensitivities, Culture-Blaming, and Gender Violence against Third-World Women Chapter 5. Meta-Lucidity, Epistemic Heroes, and the Everyday Struggle Toward Epistemic Justice 5.1. Living Up to One's Responsibilities under Conditions of Oppression: Meta-Lucidity 5.2. Promoting Lucidity and Social Change 5.3. Echoing: Chained Action, "Epistemic Heroes", and Social Networks 5.3.1. Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz: Epistemic Courage, Critical Imagination and Epistemic Friction 5.3.2. Rosa Parks: Counter-Performativity, Chained Agency, and Social Networks Chapter 6. Resistant Imagination and Radical Solidarity 6.1. Pluralistic Communities of Resistence 6.2. Normative Pluralism and Radical Solidarity 6.3. Epistemic Friction and Insurrectionary Genealogies 6.4. Guerrilla Pluralism, Counter-Memories, and Epistemologies of Ignorance 6.5. Resistant Imaginations: Toward a Kaleidoscopic Social Sensibility 6.6. Conclusion: Network Solidarity Coda References