The long-term effects of free care on birth outcomes: Evidence from a national policy reform in Zambia
The long-term effects of free care on birth outcomes: Evidence from a national policy reform in Zambia
复制标题
免费护理对出生结果的长期影响:来自赞比亚国家政策改革的证据
DOI:
10.1101/2021.05.18.21257410
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lagarde M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lagarde M
As women in many countries still fail to give birth in facilities due to financial barriers, many see the abolition of user fees as a key step on the path towards universal coverage. We exploited the staggered removal of user charges in Zambia from 2006 to estimate the effect of user fee removal up to five years after the policy change. We used data from the birth histories of two nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys to implement a difference-in-differences analysis and identify the causal impact of removing user charges on institutional and assisted deliveries, caesarean sections and neonatal deaths. We also explored heterogeneous effects of the policy. Removing fees had little effect in the short term but large positive effects appeared about two years after the policy change. Institutional deliveries in treated areas increased by 10 and 15 percentage points in peri-urban and rural districts respectively (corresponding to a 25 and 35 percent change), driven entirely by a reduction in home births. However, there was no evidence that the reform changed the behaviours of women with lower education, the proportion of caesarean sections or reduced neonatal mortality. Institutional deliveries increased where care quality was high, but not where it was low. While abolishing user charges may reduce financial hardship from healthcare payments, it does not necessarily improve equitable access to care or health outcomes. Shifting away from user fees is a necessary but insufficient step towards universal health coverage, and concurrent reforms are needed to target vulnerable populations and improve quality of care.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Sydney A. Spangler
通讯作者:
Sydney A. Spangler
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Sialubanje C;Massar K;van der Pijl MS;Kirch EM;Hamer DH;Ruiter RA
通讯作者:
Ruiter RA
DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.025
发表时间:
2010-08-01
期刊:
Social science & medicine (1982)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Spangler, Sydney A;Bloom, Shelah S
通讯作者:
Bloom, Shelah S
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1960
期刊:
The Lancet
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ruth Naughton;A. Cameron;J. Carpenter
通讯作者:
J. Carpenter
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
David Zombré;M. De Allegri;R. Platt;V. Ridde;K. Zinszer
通讯作者:
K. Zinszer