Knowing and distrusting: how political trust and knowledge shape direct-democratic participation

Knowing and distrusting: how political trust and knowledge shape direct-democratic participation
复制标题

了解与不信任:政治信任和知识如何塑造直接民主参与

DOI:
10.1080/14616696.2017.1402124
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Henrik Serup Christensen
Henrik Serup Christensen
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Henrik Serup Christensen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要本文探讨了事实政治知识和政治信任如何塑造直接民主参与的形式,支持公民的倡议在芬兰。先前的研究已经讨论了认知动员和政治不满作为直接民主支持预测因子的相对优点。这项研究建立在这些努力的基础上,但它扩大了分析的范围,以审查报告的参与,而不是支持直接民主。该研究依赖于2015年最新一轮芬兰国家选举研究(FNES2015)的数据,通过二元逻辑回归分析来研究这些问题。结果表明,事实政治知识和政治信任与直接民主参与有预期的关系。然而,当它们相互作用并朝同一方向拉动以塑造参与倾向时,它们的影响会更强。这表明,公民倡议的提案通常是知识渊博但具有批判性的公民的工作。
ABSTRACT This article examines how factual political knowledge and political trust shape direct-democratic involvement in the form of supporting citizens’ initiatives in Finland. Previous studies have debated the relative merits of cognitive mobilization and political dissatisfaction as predictors of support for direct democracy. This study builds on these efforts, but it extends the scope of analysis to examine reported participation in rather than support for direct democracy. The study relies on data from the most recent round of the Finnish National Election Study from 2015 (FNES2015) to study these questions with binary logistic regression analyses. The results suggest that both factual political knowledge and political trust have the expected relationships with direct-democratic involvement. However, their effects are stronger when they interact and pull in the same direction to shape the propensity of involvement. This indicates that proposals for citizens’ initiatives are generally the work of knowledgeable, but critical, citizens.
为什么政治很重要:让民主发挥作用
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Stoker
通讯作者: Stoker